Let's start simple. Give me examples of Trump's "racism".
What's the worst that can happen if Kamala wins?
- Thread starter Tsing Tao
- Start date
Let's start simple. Give me examples of Trump's "racism".
where and how did you grow up, ... really?
anyway - start here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racial_views_of_Donald_Trump
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/donald-trump-nabj-interview-wild-moments_n_66aa8a2ae4b050952a6f394d
https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-goes-truly-deranged-rant-190719057.html
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/20...blood-country-biden-campaign-liken-rcna130141
https://www.thedailybeast.com/fred-c-trump-iii-says-donald-trump-repeatedly-used-n-word
etc.
etc.
etc.
...
Last edited:
No, I don't think a president Kamala in and of itself leads to WWIII. What I wrote is WWIII could happen regardless of who gets elected. There are many moving parts to that senerio, as is the economic catastrophe that looms in the not too distant future.
I don't think Kamala is stupid. She is a perfect example of the "Peter principal", and unbelievably is in a position to get promoted to an even higher position after clearly demonstrating she was unqualified for her previous positions. She is a assistant prosecutor at best. All that is water over the dam. We're most likely stuck with two horrible candidates, pick your poison, just know it's poison either way. 2025 and beyond gets ugly, ugly like we haven't seen in a while. Not sure the current day citizens are ready for whatever is coming. Can we get through a 1930s type depression and possibly a world War without ripping each other to pieces during the process?
Malibu lifestyle sums it up nicely. I'm not sure this EO you fear, and with good reason, can be avoided or even diminished by the United States alone. We may have lead the world into this situation, but it's been a group effort to fuck things up for quite some time. It seems unlikely given our diminished world leader status that we can convince all the players to get on a more sustainable path. We're kinda screwed at this point. In the end all these problems will resolve themselves. Like Carlin said, the earth will be fine. People? Not so much.I agree with your identification of catastrophes to come, but I'll just add my view, which you already know I think, and that is: you're right, the worst will happen regardless of who's in the presidency. I believe because it is ecological overshoot driving the bus over the cliff. EO is causing the collapse of the biosphere in several regards right now, in real time. That will, with history as my guide, lead to social disorder, war, hunger, disease and more. There is no stopping it, because it is a state of affairs, not merely a process*. There is no technological fix—technology itself is what brought us to our current height (8 billion people x desire for a Malibu lifestyle).
Anyway, I digress into the whole point of my Ecological Overshoot thread.
Worse that can happen under Harris is that she, like the rest, simply cannot accept the truth of EO, or the necessity of leading an orderly and humane downsizing of the American economy to a sustainable level. Worse that can happen in the next six months? A contested election being handed by installed electors to the House.
/rant
*Think Titanic, the movie, when the ship's architect tells the captain the ship is going to founder, "She's made of iron, sir, I assure she can, and she will. It is a mathematical certainty."
The fact that you are unable to coherently make your argument without just cutting and pasting a number of links you quickly googled (because again, you don't actually know what you're looking for outside of talking points) proves my point. You have no intellectual discourse to offer.
The Wiki article merely states claims made and remarks that news organizations and the public have viewed some of his comments in a racist fashion. That's it. No shit, I don't need Wiki to tell me people take things out of context constantly.
The Huffpost article references "hosting a white supremacist" as the only racially toned argument you could be alluding to, and that was when Trump hosted Kanye (who is black, in case you're too stupid to know) and it was Kanye who brought Nick Fuentes (who Trump had never met and claims to not have known he was coming).
The Yahoo article makes the silly claim that Trump was being racist when he said that illegal immigrants are taking "Black jobs". And instead of focusing on the fact that this is an absolutely true statement (African Americans are being displaced by illegals), they (and you) chose to hone in on the "what is a black job" when you all know damned well what he means, you just want a "gotcha moment". Because you're all disingenuous and looking for a soundbyte to play.
The NBC article you googled refers to Trump saying "they're (immigrants) poisoning the blood of our country". And once again, because this is how you guys operate, you chose to take that to mean immigrants are making the actual blood purity of the country poisoned, and trying to make it like Hitler and the Aryan race. But again, because you're a bunch of fucking low IQ individuals, you don't see (or don't want to see) that what he actually said is that the illegal immigrant population is mostly coming from prisons and mental institutions (he's right about that) and they're poisoning the "blood" - the life blood of the country. Making it worse. This isn't racist at all, unless you manage to twist it around to mean what you want it to mean.
Lastly, Rawstory (which is a joke of a website) said this in the article you googled:
"Donald Trump repeatedly used the n-word in response to his car being damaged in the early 1970s, according to a new memoir by his nephew."
Ah. He "reportedly" used this word 50 something years ago in a memoir by his nephew (who is looking for fame and money). I see.
I maintain, Atlantic. You're a tool. Go drown yourself and rid the world of your stupidity.
PS. Please note how I didn't google any of my replies, and put my own thoughts into words of discussion. For your future reference in how to do it.
Last edited:
Ok, but if you're saying this happens no matter what, then what's the worst that happens from Kamala being elected rather than Trump?
And you can't say you don't think she's stupid and then in the next sentence call her a walking example of the Peter Principle. Those two statements are at odds.
I don't know what any of this means. You're saying if Kamala is elected....what?
Ask yourself this:
Has any policy implemented by a Pres directly affected your daily life?
I honestly can't think of anything from either side. There's some impact on the edges with tax policy, but other than that, I can't think of anything, at least in the case of my wife and I.
Trump is a carnival barking jackass and Harris is a vapid, dumber than a box rocks idiot.
It's a wash.
Has any policy implemented by a Pres directly affected your daily life?
I honestly can't think of anything from either side. There's some impact on the edges with tax policy, but other than that, I can't think of anything, at least in the case of my wife and I.
Trump is a carnival barking jackass and Harris is a vapid, dumber than a box rocks idiot.
It's a wash.
Exactly my point, Arnie! Good on, ya, brother.