===========Quote from sjfan:
I'm certain I will get flamed to high hell around here for saying this, but here goes: in my opinion, trading for yourself (in the sense usually used around this forum) does not make economic sense. The risk and reward isn't there(*). If you take it as a business
(*) There are some exceptions, of course. But, like any other business, you don't judge the prospect by looking at the highest, most visible earner.
The typical individual trader who wants to trade for a living are like this:
(1) self taught in the most narrow sense; They learned a bit about a very niche topic of dubious value - technical analysis of very liquid markets; They don't have the background knowledge; The usual discussions in the econ forum is pretty indicative of that.
(2) trades in the most competitive, liquid markets around. What's the point? There's few inefficiencies left. In fact, most strategies around here are all about taking gap risks for insurance fee (which is basically what scalping is).
(3) there's no viable venue of career progression. you trade your own capital, but you can't really go big. Other people's money will never be avaliable to you in size (I think a few guys around here worked up to 5-10MM; those are usually the low-handle on any institutional accounts).
(4) You get to work for yourself, which apparently lots of people love and cite as a reason. But if that's the case, why not own a business in whatever you actually have background in doing? I suspect the rate of success for a grocery store is no worse, and probably better, than day trader over the long cycle.
Finally, it sucks that a lot people realized late in their careers that they want to do finance. The door for institution is closed for them. There's no real way to get around that. There might be some jobs in back/middle office around, but to progress from a 35 year old middle office reporting guy 1 year on the job to an analyst is not a typical one.
Look at it this way: you want to be a doctor, you HAVE to go med school. You want to be a lawyer, you HAVE to go the lawschool. You want to professor, and while there are some who teach without a PhD, as a rule, you pretty much HAVE to go to PhD.
Institutional finance is the same. The days of hiring "street smart" hustlers is over. Modern portfolio management is specialized, takes a lot education and experience. Even the older generation of senior PMs within the business itself is getting left behind because they aren't up it.
So, I know what I'm saying is probably not something you want to hear. But my view is, if you are individualistic and want to run your own business (which is great, btw), find something that's got a better chance of working out than day trading. To do so is not to be brave or courageous, but to be bad at making business decision.
Good points Sjf;
Probably right on grocery store owners have a better chance ;
than daytraders over the long term.
[2]Not sure i would agree with '' gap risk for insurance fee''which is basically what scalping is . I could agree with that;
but the trends are so different, profits are so different [for me anyway] & comissions are so different.I guess my main point is an experienced insurance premium collector does much better than the average scalper.
I dont know how the average market maker does in comparison to the average insurance premium collector.
Nice work.

I tried to find his name and the articles back but I can't find it anymore.