what's the deal with collective2?

Quote from fluttrader:

Hard to believe that C2 will fix the price everytime you report it as incorrect

Not really. If I'm long and the closing trade executes at 3:59:00 and the price on every data feed is 20.00 but the C2 trade says 19.90 they better damn well fix it. It happens a lot. Trust me on that. Every time I closed a trade I always hoped the mispricing would go in my favor. If it did, it would usually be a price that occurred a few minutes before.
 
Quote from rolextrader:

C2 has an interesting concept but its design and implementation is seriously flawed in certain areas, particulary the administration of erroneous or inaccurate data it receives from third party trading platforms. When a system developer finds a problem with a trade, C2 will simply go to the information it received from the sender of the data to confirm that what C2 posted is in fact what it received. And that is where its responsibility begins and ends.

If the trade was transmitted inaccurately or way off base, C2 doesn't care as long as it can confirm the information on its servers. So, if your data provider for some reason sends a very bad report, that report will stay on C2 regardless how far from reality it may be. C2 assumes no responsibilty for these types of errors and has no interest in curing the situation regardless who is at fault for the mistake. There is no verification so to speak on C2 other than what a data provider sends to it. That's all C2 verifies--what it does or doesn't receive.

So what does this meant to the developer who is trying to market his system with a so-called "system verification" platform as C2 represent itself? Lets say, for example, he places a trade with his broker via NinjaTrader to BTO at X price and this is accurately reported to C2. Minutes later, he closes out the position at Y price ( a big profit), but Ninja has a data transmission problem or C2's server is on the whack and the STC order never gets to C2.

So, as far as C2 is concerned, the developer has an open order. The developer, upon learning that the order was not transmitted to C2, must now go to C2 order entry platform and close the trade regardless if the current price has no bearing to the actual price he was filled at from Ninja. So, if he takes a big loss on C2, it will be reflected on his system stats even though this trade is complete distortion of what transpired in reality and the system he is marketing is grossly inaccurate in its representation to those who view it on C2. In this theoretical example, a big actual profit will be reported on C2 as a big actual loss. This and this alone renders C2 useless in my opinion.

If C2 were a broker (which its not, although it has an auto-trade mechanism) this trade would be busted and the customer (developer) would get the proper fill. But that is not the case here and it opens a gaping hole in what both developers and subscribers need to make this business model have value.

The concept of C2 is good and may be valuable some time in the future if it can become a realtime, accurate reporter of live trades and work in tandem with it's data providers to insure the accuracy of the information it's presenting to the public regardless what party is at fault if it is inaccurate.

1. Rolex just provided a completely accurate statement... that C2 is completely inaccurate in certain situations.

2. C2 uses SPAN for margin calculations. If you're trading your system in realtime and often bump YOUR BROKERS margin ceiling, you will definitely get erratic fills and stuck open/close/partial positions because SPAN (C2) 99% of the time will not matchup with your brokers day margins. OF course you can adjust to it... but that's not the point, is it.

3. As mentioned, there are serious data issues between Ninja and C2, which-->

4. Matthew Klein is aware of but transfers all liabilities to third party vendors (read:NT), of course C2 is flawless.
He is very arrogant in his responses regarding shortcomings in HIS software.
 
Quote from marketsurfer:

our boy

This is pure spam, Surf, knock it off....We are discussing C2 here, not your fucking boy....

The problem with C2 right now is the speed of fills. A market order can take as much as 20 seconds to execute, more if there are subscribers autotrading. That is simply just bad business and unacceptale.

Now if the vendor is swingtrading with a few trades a day, it might not be an issue, but for scalping system this issue alone makes or breakes the system's performance record...

My guess for the servers' slow down is that there are too many statistics running and probably too many systems trading at the same time...
 
Quote from Pekelo:

.

The problem with C2 right now is the speed of fills. A market order can take as much as 20 seconds to execute, more if there are subscribers autotrading.

It can take up to 20 seconds before a trade is logged ?
Under what conditions did you experience this ?
 
Quote from fluttrader:

Hard to believe that C2 will fix the price everytime you report it as incorrect
They won't do that. Instead, they will look at their autotrail report and if the posted trades match their paperwork from the transmitter of the data, the conversation is over and the trades don't change.

You have to have an extremley compelling case before Matthew changes anything; for example, the data sent was incorrect and confirmed by the front-end sender, like Ninja.
 
Quote from bronks:

1. Rolex just provided a completely accurate statement... that C2 is completely inaccurate in certain situations.

2. C2 uses SPAN for margin calculations. If you're trading your system in realtime and often bump YOUR BROKERS margin ceiling, you will definitely get erratic fills and stuck open/close/partial positions because SPAN (C2) 99% of the time will not matchup with your brokers day margins. OF course you can adjust to it... but that's not the point, is it.

3. As mentioned, there are serious data issues between Ninja and C2, which-->

4. Matthew Klein is aware of but transfers all liabilities to third party vendors (read:NT), of course C2 is flawless.
He is very arrogant in his responses regarding shortcomings in HIS software.

He is arrogant, indeed. If Ninja is the root cause of the problem, Matthew wil hint that you should change vendors, since the ultimate responsibility for everything is the developer, not C2. So those of us who run a real trading business should find another way other than our tried and true suppliers to play make believe on C2? I think not.

And yet he keeps his affiliation with Ninja (and kisses their butt, too) knowing full well it is a very inferior vendor for transmitting accurate and timely data to C2.
 
I came across this website a long time ago.
I couldn't believe the numbers either. There were so many systems seemingly making money hand over fist. Something had to be wrong.
I 've always distrusted systems, some people trade systems and make millions but they must have something else the average system trader doesn't have.

I am not a system trader obviously but it's become obvious to me that my suspicion about systems was correct, there are a great deal of parameters that are not taken into account when a system is designed, there is no way to integrate those parameters into the system , some of them mya be unknown to you at the time yopu design the system.

That means even a good system will in most cases not perform as well as the simulation.

But you just have to ask yourself, if these guys on C2 are so good, why don't they trade their system. OK tehy say they want to sell it too. Alright but if you have a damn good system, why don't you just sell some leser good systems , variations of the best one and trade the holy grail yourself ?

It's all an illusion.
 
Quote from rolextrader:

They won't do that. Instead, they will look at their autotrail report and if the posted trades match their paperwork from the transmitter of the data, the conversation is over and the trades don't change.

You have to have an extremley compelling case before Matthew changes anything; for example, the data sent was incorrect and confirmed by the front-end sender, like Ninja.

I've had him change MANY trades for me, no questions asked as long as his price was incorrect. Once MY data was incorrect and I asked for a price change and he said no. As expected.

I'm not trying to defend the guy or anything. I actually stopped using the service cause he was a prick to me in one of our emails. I didn't want to support his business anymore.
 
Doesn't Ninja send the actual fill prices to C2?!
Isn't it like one must place real money trades and NT sends the True Fills?

One thing interesting was when looking at the 3.5+ year old systems, there was NOT one that I liked even the profitable ones! It goes a long way to show the truth about trading success and it's myths...
 
Back
Top