My shorting GOOGL calls in Jul 2015 was a very bad trade.Seriously? Ask those who sell premium on NFLX in April and July 2015. Or AMZN in April 2015. Or GOOG in July 2015.

My shorting GOOGL calls in Jul 2015 was a very bad trade.Seriously? Ask those who sell premium on NFLX in April and July 2015. Or AMZN in April 2015. Or GOOG in July 2015.

She seemed to be an accountant who thought she had a unique way to defer losses and keep earning a paycheck every month. For example, apparently she would donate a portion of the profits to the charity which would then put the money back in to her fund. Seems like a tax loophole she was trying to exploit. Not saying there is anything wrong with trying to work the tax code, but to me that shows the mindset she was trading with. She probably thought that in the end it would all work out, just keep rolling until the market stops moving and then you are back in the green.I wonder if she got bad advice or if she was too stupid to get any....it strikes me that the same person who thinks they can avoid a huge loss at some point when selling short straddles might also believe that the regulations aren't that important and that it might be ok to dupe the investors for a charitable cause. Did anyone think she seemed narcissistic in the videos?
She seemed to be an accountant who thought she had a unique way to defer losses and keep earning a paycheck every month. For example, apparently she would donate a portion of the profits to the charity which would then put the money back in to her fund. Seems like a tax loophole she was trying to exploit. Not saying there is anything wrong with trying to work the tax code, but to me that shows the mindset she was trading with. She probably thought that in the end it would all work out, just keep rolling until the market stops moving and then you are back in the green.
That one is not TRue. Going through Tastetrade you can get reduced commissions from TOS. So your comment is just wrong.Tasty Trade is a marketing vehicle to generate fat commissions for TOS.
I don't see anything wrong with using calendars. Of course at some point you have to take the loss. But if you can take a loss on long call in first part of the month and sell calendars later in the month that make the loss positive why not do it. SEC allegations are only valid if one accepts the calendars trade were bad for the investors and where schemes. Tell you what She can invest my money that way all day.She seemed to be an accountant who thought she had a unique way to defer losses and keep earning a paycheck every month. For example, apparently she would donate a portion of the profits to the charity which would then put the money back in to her fund. Seems like a tax loophole she was trying to exploit. Not saying there is anything wrong with trying to work the tax code, but to me that shows the mindset she was trading with. She probably thought that in the end it would all work out, just keep rolling until the market stops moving and then you are back in the green.
First there isn't any jail time involved. the profits were not fake. I take profits in my trades this week nothing wrong with that if there is a unrealized lost sitting there next week I have to address. Seems pretty good trading to me. Market makers take these types of trades daily.The sad part about Karen Burton, super trader or jailbird, is that TOM still defends her. She is a mini Madoff... period.
If her strategy was an honest one of rolling until it goes her way, why did she bill SIX MILLION on fake profits? She could have not billed and then maybe i'd believe her. Also people who exited early didn't lose; IE Ponzi scheme implications clear as day. They were able to get a piece of the FAKE profits she billed on. Karen maybe going to jail.
Either way, The reason Tom Sosnoff defends her is obvious, she supports the TastyTrade mantra. However she did not make her profits the TastyTrade way, she made it the old fashioned and guaranteed way; With FRAUD.