Two options that work for me:
If liquidity is thin, I usually just opt for market out since I will not be able to find much liquidity to get my orders out ahead of other orders who are also in some kind of panic mode.
If liquidity is pretty good, I don't mind waiting for a pivot to sell into a bounce. The caveat I face is that the pivot is worse than what a market order would have given me, but who can know the future. Point is that with more liquidity, I can find levels that might offer better exits and attack those levels with my orders. Routes used are arbitrary...the smart routes are all pretty much doing same things nowadays so it's important to find thick levels off pivots that would offer the better exit.
Two last points:
Faster selling is usually the panic mode of everyone else. Classic tape reading capitulation setup..instead of eating the loss "at any price", there is usually a snap back reversal in the cards..where buyers are easier to sell to than sellers. If you have the stomach for it and can wait for this snap back..you will be able to exit easier at a price you see for liquidity, rather than handing it over to the market.
Second and this is the biggest point of it all...one ugly trade against you doesn't matter..or shouldn't, in terms of an overall trading plan. The risk on the stock should have been in risk parameters set forth by the trading plan. It's "average" loss over a series of X number of trades that matters. Assuming you aren't a constant stop blower or that you constantly trade stocks out of your realm of execution abilities and this is just "one of those trades", then the importance of this ugliness won't matter in the overall strategy. JCOM was the last one to bite me in early September on a failed capitulation setup. Sure it eats into your profit pool, but overall it doesn't destroy my system.
I guess I'm tying the "how to get out" with the "don't worry much about how" as this one trade shouldn't matter overall. As for practicalities, my above explanations works best for me as it relates to liquidity of the stock.
Chris
If liquidity is thin, I usually just opt for market out since I will not be able to find much liquidity to get my orders out ahead of other orders who are also in some kind of panic mode.
If liquidity is pretty good, I don't mind waiting for a pivot to sell into a bounce. The caveat I face is that the pivot is worse than what a market order would have given me, but who can know the future. Point is that with more liquidity, I can find levels that might offer better exits and attack those levels with my orders. Routes used are arbitrary...the smart routes are all pretty much doing same things nowadays so it's important to find thick levels off pivots that would offer the better exit.
Two last points:
Faster selling is usually the panic mode of everyone else. Classic tape reading capitulation setup..instead of eating the loss "at any price", there is usually a snap back reversal in the cards..where buyers are easier to sell to than sellers. If you have the stomach for it and can wait for this snap back..you will be able to exit easier at a price you see for liquidity, rather than handing it over to the market.
Second and this is the biggest point of it all...one ugly trade against you doesn't matter..or shouldn't, in terms of an overall trading plan. The risk on the stock should have been in risk parameters set forth by the trading plan. It's "average" loss over a series of X number of trades that matters. Assuming you aren't a constant stop blower or that you constantly trade stocks out of your realm of execution abilities and this is just "one of those trades", then the importance of this ugliness won't matter in the overall strategy. JCOM was the last one to bite me in early September on a failed capitulation setup. Sure it eats into your profit pool, but overall it doesn't destroy my system.
I guess I'm tying the "how to get out" with the "don't worry much about how" as this one trade shouldn't matter overall. As for practicalities, my above explanations works best for me as it relates to liquidity of the stock.
Chris