Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission is not relevant in this case.
That is how stupid you are. That case decided in a 7–2 decision, the Court ruled on narrow grounds that the Commission did not employ religious neutrality, violating Masterpiece owner Jack Phillips' rights to free exercise, and reversed the Commission's decision. The Court did not rule on the broader intersection of anti-discrimination laws, free exercise of religion, and freedom of speech, due to the complications of the Commission's lack of religious neutrality.
EDUCATING IGNORANT CONSTITUTIONAL SCHOLARS FOR DUMMIES
Government order banning religious services or better said, ALL gatherings of people for religious services due to health and safety reasons issued by the President of the U.S., the CDC, the Surgeon General and many Governor's as well.
Is the law ARBITRARY?
NO! It applies to all public gatherings of any kind and religious gatherings are included in this order and not singled out.
Is the law religious neutral?
Yes it applies to all social gatherings not a specific religion and is being applied to all Christian, Jewish and Muslim houses of worships.
Is the law REASONABLE?
Yes the order was based on a national declaration of health emergency by the President of the United States, the CDC, the Surgeon General, the Corona Virus Task Force and is consistent with similar bans all around the world. THe rule was put into place with bipartisan support at all levels of government. Only fucktards dont understand this.
Can you cite some law to back up the right of the government to not permit public assembly?
YES I CAN!
Jones v. Parmley, 465 F.3d 46, 56–57 (2d Cir. 2006)
The First Amendment does not provide the right to conduct an assembly at which there is a clear and present danger of riot, disorder, or interference with traffic on public streets, or other immediate threat to public safety or order
CASE DISMISSED!
That is how stupid you are. That case decided in a 7–2 decision, the Court ruled on narrow grounds that the Commission did not employ religious neutrality, violating Masterpiece owner Jack Phillips' rights to free exercise, and reversed the Commission's decision. The Court did not rule on the broader intersection of anti-discrimination laws, free exercise of religion, and freedom of speech, due to the complications of the Commission's lack of religious neutrality.
EDUCATING IGNORANT CONSTITUTIONAL SCHOLARS FOR DUMMIES
Government order banning religious services or better said, ALL gatherings of people for religious services due to health and safety reasons issued by the President of the U.S., the CDC, the Surgeon General and many Governor's as well.
Is the law ARBITRARY?
NO! It applies to all public gatherings of any kind and religious gatherings are included in this order and not singled out.
Is the law religious neutral?
Yes it applies to all social gatherings not a specific religion and is being applied to all Christian, Jewish and Muslim houses of worships.
Is the law REASONABLE?
Yes the order was based on a national declaration of health emergency by the President of the United States, the CDC, the Surgeon General, the Corona Virus Task Force and is consistent with similar bans all around the world. THe rule was put into place with bipartisan support at all levels of government. Only fucktards dont understand this.
Can you cite some law to back up the right of the government to not permit public assembly?
YES I CAN!
Jones v. Parmley, 465 F.3d 46, 56–57 (2d Cir. 2006)
The First Amendment does not provide the right to conduct an assembly at which there is a clear and present danger of riot, disorder, or interference with traffic on public streets, or other immediate threat to public safety or order
CASE DISMISSED!
