This = Genius.
Agreed. His argument was essentially the exact same that they are trying to make.
This = Genius.
You shouldn't be allowed to drive because it puts me at risk from being run over by you.
You shouldn't be allowed to sell me soda and hamburgers because it puts me at risk for obesity.
You shouldn't be allowed to smoke because it puts me at risk for lung cancer.
Your problems and fears shouldn't be someone elses problems. I can use your argument for anything.
You shouldn't be allowed to drive because it puts me at risk from being run over by you.
You shouldn't be allowed to sell me soda and hamburgers because it puts me at risk for obesity.
You shouldn't be allowed to smoke because it puts me at risk for lung cancer.
Why are these thing socially acceptable?
If you don't want to get infected, YOU stay home.
That said, I do practice social distancing and even go so far as to wear gloves and a face mask when I go out which I'll tell you is a lot more than most of the people are doing. I'm absolutely for everyone staying home until this is over, but I draw the line at jailing people who don't.
Every nation that deals with this has done something differently. You can't just say "this nation did a national lockdown, that's why they were so successful". Nor can you say that the one and only reason the virus spread was because irresponsible people went out and partied. There are many states not under a lockdown in the US right now. They don't seem to have brush fires. They don't seem to have medical facilities as "war zones".
There's a complex model that has to be done here. It's not just saying "everyone needs to stay home", the economy be damned.
I saw the numbers from NYC. It's true.
Dude, your numbers are garbage. Look at NYC. How many deaths? A few thousand with underlying conditions? Out of a city with what? 3 million ppl with underlying conditions? Do the math. Figure out what ur denominator is first. Only a fraction of those sick ppl who contract WuFlu will die from it.
Just because nearly all Wu-Flu deaths are people with pre-existing illness, doesn't mean EVERY PERSON WITH PRE-EXISTING ILLNESS WILL DIE OF WU-FLU. In fact, going by NYC numbers, its totally opposite !!
Neither side of this argument is right or wrong at this point. Only the courts can decide whether or not the constitutional right suppression we're seeing right now is legally justified. I absolutely support most of the measures we're taking, but I have serious doubts that they'll hold up in court if challenged.
It's not just the number deaths. It's that the economy will anyway be completely crippled for many months if not over a year if infections will reach the majority in employment. Not everyone will get infected in the same 2 weeks. It will spread out over a long period of time and even if you let infected people work their productivity would be so severely limited that it would have a much worse effect on the economy than shutting it down completely to bring the number of total infections down to manageable levels