Now I see that you are trying to be a humble brag and self-promote in the guise of acting like a do gooder. You have failed to add anything of substantive meaning to this discussion, all the while you were pretending to be a know it all, at which you have failed too as I have removed the cloak from your guised self promotion. Get a job.
Let's make it a little simpler for the challenged ones, to generate your $50k you are inducing up to to $millions (100x) of liabilities on investors and/or $100,000s on the fund manager (10x), no matter how desperate you are to generate fees in 2023, that is still not the way to go, yet it will not stop most people trying, on the contrary they are so desperate today they do not care.
"You have failed to add anything of substantive meaning to this discussion" - actually on that part you are completely correct and I am happy to agree with you, anyone or any entity which could actually allow you to succeed doing it correctly would simply walk away from you, because they know you are trying to liability offset while you create a massive liability spread either side of you, it does not work today and for anyone with any intelligence that approach never worked before.
You see, I had the option to do what you are proposing and make $100,000s but actually $millions in fees helping run a private fund at 50%pa with $10s millions invested on a +3 Sharpe, at which point the architecture owners and fund prospectus writers (unless you trade the markets as a fund manager yourself fascinated how you would provide this service because the off the shelf providers don't have a clue) anyway they stopped launch until the fund owner came to their senses, the fund owner paused and came back a year later expecting a 'more aligned' answer than incubate on AKJ or IB F&F.
Actually it's even funnier than that, the incorporation firm (again they did absolutely nothing on strategy, prospectus, risk) who were the largest in the jurisdiction with the partner being on the countries cabinet before running their own hedge fund incorporation, they actually accepted the fund launch and the architects had to stop the launch explaining the risk to client capital was too high in to what they knew was increasing market volatility, unless the risk offsets were in place which the fund owner complained at because it made the fund a harder sell to investors, although today less difficult because the volatility kicked in and the architects were 100% correct, this "What's a hedge fund structure worth to you?" question is too funny on a public forum.
