What to know about the trial of Kim Potter, the ex-officer who killed Daunte Wright

Cops have a dangerous job, and (rightfully so), they are constantly on edge. There is no way in the world imo that this woman intentionally shot that guy. No more than Alex Baldwin shot the cinematographer intentionally.

Did she choke under pressure? Yes. Maybe she should have never been hired. Or maybe they did an inadequate job of training her. Don't they have simulators these days? Methods to train these people under pressure? Those are expensive af I'd imagine, so I'm sure whatever town she was in didn't have them. It goes back to my post long ago that if we really want police reform, it will be slow, but there needs to be a university established with lots of Federal bucks, that teaches nothing but how to be an intelligent cop. Congress could pass a law that says after ... 2032... any new hires to any law enforcement agency in the US must have a degree from this place. But I digress. As always.

You can bet they'll be digging deep into everything she has ever said or written on social media. One politically incorrect FB or TWTR post on her part in the last 30 years, and they'll be painting her as a grand wizard of the Klan.

She'll get off. The family should go after the local municipality for hiring someone who cracked under pressure and/or wasn't adequately challenged enough in training to deal with the threats cops now have to deal with unfortunately.


She is not being charged with intentionally shooting the guy..re read the article you posted. She is a 26 year veteran..she definitely committed culpable negligence that led to a death.

The guy was resisting away from her..not charging her or attacking her. He was trapped in the car. A trained cop could have taken half a second to reach for the tassr and fire it. She had plenty of time to yell Taser Taser Taser.

Copa can kill you so their fuck ups are less forgiven..especially a 26 year veteran.
 
Yeah but there has to be something for cops. Some kind of ... I dunno what you would call it... some kind of "in the line of duty" caveat that can be applied or at least weighed by a jury. It would be different if it were you or I, but there has to be some allowance for a cop to unintentionally f up. Right?


Not when cops can kill you....you want cops to be held to a different standard and that is exactly what is wrong with cops... above the law and no accountability.

Cops spend 26 years with tasers on one side and guns on the other. Intent is irrelevant when culpable negligence causes a death.
 
Or lets say an ER nurse is caught up in a high tension code situation and in the heat of the moment hands a cardiology Doc a syringe with 20mg of whatever instead of the maximum 10mg and the patient dies right there.
Should that nurse get a manslaughter charge?

Not the same....a syringe is not sitting around with 20 ccs of whatever....doctors call out instructions and nurses respond. Accidents happen but medicine is not 100% fixed...even a proper action can kill a patient and a mistake like misreading instructions is a civil case of pure negligence because a doctor and a nurse has implied permission to touch you and perform procedures. If negligence occurs during this it is professional malpractice.

A cop does.not have permission to shoot you except in extremely limited cases and in this case the officer had no cause to shoot the guy at all.
 
It said 10-15 years.Thats pretty long for a cop even though I doubt they would give her the maximum.

2nd degree carries maximum of 10 which means if they find her guilty I could see judge giving her 2-3 years or something at the lower end since this was truly a case of criminal negligence.
 
Back
Top