Amen to that statement.The biggest risk is taking no risk.
GL.
Amen to that statement.The biggest risk is taking no risk.
GL.
Actually, if your strategy TRULY works, working for a fund is the way to go unless you are awash with capital. It's better to have 10-15% of a multi-million PnL than a 100% of a few hundred grand.What I've been slowly realizing though over the years is that working for a fund isn't worth it if your strategy truly works.
You know what this is an example of, right?All of the successful futures traders I know are doing it as a hobby and never worked at a fund or under anyone in finance.

If you have absolutely no capital, sure, but this guy said he made 80% in his first year. Even if that's 80% of 20k, that's enough money to trade your way to any life through options and futures. It might take another year or two or three, but if his strategy is good, he's fine. Success is based on management, whether it's 10k or 10 mil. And there's lots of brokers with great margins for people with less money.Actually, if your strategy TRULY works, working for a fund is the way to go unless you are awash with capital. It's better to have 10-15% of a multi-million PnL than a 100% of a few hundred grand.
You know what this is an example of, right?![]()
TRUE...Unless you have the smarts and intuition of Bradley Cooper in "Limitless".Actually, if your strategy TRULY works, working for a fund is the way to go unless you are awash with capital. It's better to have 10-15% of a multi-million PnL than a 100% of a few hundred grand.
For starters, he has to eat and if you want a reasonable lifestyle it takes money. Certainly more than 60k, if you have kids. Then there is a matter of path dependency - unless he's making money with a Sharpe of 4, he will have down months and even down years. Finally, there is a matter alpha decay - a fund will be much more forgiving if you have a track record of making money.If you have absolutely no capital, sure, but this guy said he made 80% in his first year. Even if that's 80% of 20k, that's enough money to trade your way to any life through options and futures. It might take another year or two or three, but if his strategy is good, he's fine. Success is based on management, whether it's 10k or 10 mil. And there's lots of brokers with great margins for people with less money.
Sampling biasAnd no, what is it an example of?
You don't know many people who worked in finance, so your friends that are trading for themselves don't come from that background. Just like I don't know anyone IRL who's managing less than 10 million, but I do know such people exist.Is that movie worth watching, btw?TRUE...Unless you have the smarts and intuition of Bradley Cooper in "Limitless".
Sampling biasYou don't know many people who worked in finance, so your friends that are trading for themselves don't come from that background. Just like I don't know anyone IRL who's managing less than 10 million, but I do know such people exist.
Hard for us little guys to find structural dislocation.My career goal was to be a clown at McDonalds, but they cancelled that position and I had to settle
Good answer, even though I was not asking for specifics. Broadly speaking, the edge can come from three sources - investment/research process, lack of competition and a structural dislocation. If you are saying that you have an investment process edge, better be well equipped to prove it.
Hard for us little guys to find structural dislocation.