CQG...flawless
CQG is a broker, not a routing mechanism for stocks.
CQG...flawless
NSDQ & ARCA, sometimes but rarely BATS.
Thank you for your reply. Is there a specific reason why you occasionally use BATS?
Typically if you cancel the remainder and are stuck with 50 shares you are allowed to sell 50, but you can't open a new ticket to add another 50. You should be able to add 150 though. Either way, you should only get charged for shares traded even if it's partial.
I specialize in trading tech stocks, so the former ecn's are usually enough. However, trading goog/amzn/nflx/tsla can be sketchy with wide spreads, and sometimes BATS is just the next best fill is all.
Very true. But I'm still not sure if you would get charged for the initial 100 if you only get filled on 50. I remember getting filled on 12 shares when I sent an order for 1000, and I honestly haven't checked my statement yet to see what I was charged.
You should have only been charged for the filled shares. Imagine posting a 1 million share trade and only getting 1 share filled and get charged for the full million haha XD.
I use NASDA/Island & Arca for smaller trade sizes, IEX for larger orders or wider spreads.
IEX has a new order type that recently got approved 'D-Limit', this should be a game changer.
Citadel is having a fit over the IEX 'D-Limit', filing big law suites against regulators - they say this order type gives the users an unfair advantage over them - that's music to my ears.
https://www.tradersmagazine.com/dep...-comes-out-to-support-iex-d-limit-order-type/