What really happened ....11 september
- Thread starter NickBarings
- Start date
every thing hiroshima spews is based on low probability occurrence. how embarrassing hiromo. the govt knows they are full of shit and so when they change their conspiracy theory they will go back and say... "see, we said it had a low probability... this new garbage... this is the ticket.... jump on this garbage hiroko." and hiromo will get all excited and come on here with a completely new set of bogus lies and act all confident. LOL LOL LOL too funny.
don't forget, hiropi is an iron worker.... he works on choppers !!!!!!!!! too funny.. i am not making this stuff up.
don't forget, hiropi is an iron worker.... he works on choppers !!!!!!!!! too funny.. i am not making this stuff up.
The World Trade center buildings were in fact designed and built to withstand impact from aircraft.
Frank A Demartini - on-site construction manager:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4894286030075629980&q=Frank+A.+DeMartini&hl=en
Some specifications regarding the WTC buildings:
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/design.html
I used to be in the 17% camp of individuals who believed the official govt accounts of that day. I do not anymore.
The fact that the building fell in just over 10 seconds, at the speed of gravity itself. One could make the argument that the steel did not have time to fail. The building was in free-fall with no support from any of the floors beneath.
The pancake theory is a lie. For the steel to fail it would have to be given a chance to fail. Some time to fail. At just a half-second per floor, it would have taken 50 - 60 seconds for WTC1&2 to fall.
That's why the pancake theory was retracted.
Furthermore, Govts have access to explosive materials that are not available to private demolition companies. How something burned, squibs,etc... are not proof that it wasn't demolished.
Frank A Demartini - on-site construction manager:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4894286030075629980&q=Frank+A.+DeMartini&hl=en
Some specifications regarding the WTC buildings:
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/design.html
I used to be in the 17% camp of individuals who believed the official govt accounts of that day. I do not anymore.
The fact that the building fell in just over 10 seconds, at the speed of gravity itself. One could make the argument that the steel did not have time to fail. The building was in free-fall with no support from any of the floors beneath.
The pancake theory is a lie. For the steel to fail it would have to be given a chance to fail. Some time to fail. At just a half-second per floor, it would have taken 50 - 60 seconds for WTC1&2 to fall.
That's why the pancake theory was retracted.
Furthermore, Govts have access to explosive materials that are not available to private demolition companies. How something burned, squibs,etc... are not proof that it wasn't demolished.
there are many documents describing the concrete walls surrounding the core, i already gave u one link earlier and that's just one doc.
also oxford uni describe it.
here's one:
http://algoxy.com/conc/core.html
and another:
http://www.ussartf.org/world_trade_center_disaster.htm
and again, scroll down 'till u get to the design and description:
http://www.discover.com/issue/oct-02/feature/featbuildings
there are many many more links in the internet.
and these are quotes from wtc engineers:
frank a. demartini, on-site construction manager for the world trade center, spoke of the resilence of the towers in an interview recorded on jan 25, 2001.
"the building was designed to have a fully loaded 707 crash into it. that was the largest plane of the time. i believe that the building could sustain multiple impacts of jetliners because this structure is like a the mosquito netting on your screen door --this intense grid-- and the jet plane is just a pencil puncturing that screen netting. it really does nothing to the screen netting."
john skilling who was one of the two structure engineers responsible for designing the wtc.
skilling recounts his people having carried out an analysis, which found the twin towers could withstand the impact of a boeing 707. he says, "our analysis indicated the biggest problem would be the fact that all the fuel [from the airplane] would dump into the building. there would be horrendous fire. a lot people would be killed, but he says." the building structure would still be there.". "the buildings have been investigated and found to be safe in an assumed collision with a large jet airliner [boeing 707], traveling at 600miles per hour. analysis indicates that such collision would result in only LOCAL DAMAGE WHICH COULD NOT CAUSE COLLAPSE OR SUBSTANTIAL DAMAGE TO THE BUILDING AND WOULD NOT ENDANGER THE LIVES AND SAFETY OF THE OCCUPANTS NOT IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA OF IMPACT."
Ok... 'dood'.
Once again, it is fascinating to see how deeply invested the tinfoil-hat club truly is. At this point, there is no going back. Fantastic lies like 'CNN 84% of Americans' show that these people are beyond redemption.
Once again, the only two analogies I can make are to the clinical delusion and very deep religious faith.