Bit:
>you should consider the very likely possibilty of
>demolition. all the visual evidence points at that:
Actually, the very thing that could convince me of demolition is missing, mising , missing -- and that is the visual evidence of the organized explosives required to slice the outer columns.
Those few random windows blowing out in the videos are neither enough to do the job, nor in the right location for the failure sequence.
JB
>you should consider the very likely possibilty of
>demolition. all the visual evidence points at that:
Actually, the very thing that could convince me of demolition is missing, mising , missing -- and that is the visual evidence of the organized explosives required to slice the outer columns.
Those few random windows blowing out in the videos are neither enough to do the job, nor in the right location for the failure sequence.
JB