What really happened ....11 september

Quote from 5Pillars:

Either did the congressional members who have taken this persons testimony in several hearings.....the person of the story btw has an impeccable military record and has had several other testify to the same information.....but don't expect any congressman to run out and push for a true reinvestigation of 9/11 (they do not have the courage to).
More...
new information to me. would change the picture. the other thing
is that with this kind of information and this kind of case you can
become a nation wide heroe overnight. the congressman of the
year. i do not buy the lack-of-courage story.
 
Quote from man:

new information to me. would change the picture. the other thing
is that with this kind of information and this kind of case you can
become a nation wide heroe overnight. the congressman of the
year. i do not buy the lack-of-courage story.
More...

i am waiting for the day someone will become a real hero...it may happen, and sooner than we think. gawd willing.
 
Quote from man:

new information to me. would change the picture. the other thing
is that with this kind of information and this kind of case you can
become a nation wide heroe overnight. the congressman of the
year. i do not buy the lack-of-courage story.
More...

Threatening of ones life and their family has proven exceptionally effective throughout history by those who control power. Send an e-mail to former Congressman Scarborough of Florida about this (from "Scarborough Country" MSNBC TV show).
 
Quote from man:

new information to me. would change the picture. the other thing
is that with this kind of information and this kind of case you can
become a nation wide heroe overnight. the congressman of the
year. i do not buy the lack-of-courage story.
More...

Morgan Reynolds, Ph.D., is professor emeritus at Texas A&M University and former director of the Criminal Justice Center at the National Center for Policy Analysis headquartered in Dallas, TX. He served as chief economist for the US Department of Labor during 2001–2, George W. Bush's first term.

http://www.lewrockwell.com/reynolds/reynolds12.html

"To explain the unanticipated free-fall collapses of the twin towers at the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001, mainstream experts (also see The American Professional Constructor, October 2004, pp. 12–18) offer a three-stage argument: 1) an airplane impact weakened each structure, 2) an intense fire thermally weakened structural components that may have suffered damage to fireproofing materials, causing buckling failures, which, in turn, 3) allowed the upper floors to pancake onto the floors below.

Many will nod their head, OK, that does it and go back to watching the NBA finals or whatever, but I find this theory just about as satisfying as the fantastic conspiracy theory that "19 young Arabs acting at the behest of Islamist extremists headquartered in distant Afghanistan" caused 9/11. The government’s collapse theory is highly vulnerable on its own terms, but its blinkered narrowness and lack of breadth is the paramount defect unshared by its principal scientific rival – controlled demolition. Only professional demolition appears to account for the full range of facts associated with the collapses of WTC 1 (North Tower), WTC 2 (South Tower), and the much-overlooked collapse of the 47-story WTC building 7 at 5:21 pm on that fateful day.

The scientific controversy over the initial structural weakening has two parts: what caused the original tower damage and did that damage "severely" weaken the structures? Photos show a stable, motionless North Tower (WTC 1) after the damage suffered at 8:46 am and the South Tower after its 9:03 am impact. If we focus on the North Tower, close examination of photos reveals arguably "minor" rather than "severe" damage in the North Tower and its perimeter columns. ....." cont.
 
I know what really happened on 9/11...

Two airplanes drove into the WTC towers. They got hot and burned.

The steel inside became very hot and melted which made the
buildings fall down. Many innocent people died that day.

My son was 3 years old at the time. He told me this...

Yes, even a 3 year old understands what happened on 9/11...:cool:
 
i am very interested in evidence and - really - i am still
open to arguments. nevertheless i think that we guys
here really can not perfectly judge what happened to
an extent to entitle name giving.

did you guys ever read the leuchter report on auschwitz
lie? sounds really convincing somehow. then see the
documentation on fred leuchter and everything just
vanishes.

what i am trying to say is: be sceptic to both sides in
an emotional case like this. it is not necessary that
people are lying, just maybe have some distortion of
their memory due to preformed opinion. just consider
the lieutenant had said: "as if they had ordered that
we stay down." cut out part of it and you have "evidence".
no intentional misunderstanding. just normal stuff. but
in this context: morning of 911, norad center, lieutenant
"orders", things start to get a meaning that never was
there.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top