What really happened ....11 september

Quote from ratboy88:

corky puts me on ignore.... how will i ever survive?

ratgirl... attacked on all sides... flailing away....posting Google Video links like a madwoman.

ratgirl whines:

'IT'S A CONSPIRACY TO DISCREDIT ME!!!'
 
Quote from traderNik:

Yes, I remember that... you posted with an apology, saying that your behaviour was that of an immature teenager. Then you deleted the apology and posted a conspiracy theory suggesting the Bush family was responsible for the Xmas Tsunami a few years back. You suggested that they worked in concert with Space Aliens and that the proof was posted on Google Video, as I recall.

you may want to lower the dosage nikki. LOL LOL LOL... wow... that really got to you huh? too funny.

nikki whines, "i admit defeat, the langan thread showed me to be the little trollop i truly am."
 
Quote from HolyGrail:

I've often wondered what kind of mind someone must have to believe some of this crap. Now I don't even want to know.:mad:
you were unable to write a single post without bashing.
no matter if you are right or wrong, it disqualifies you
as a serious opponent in a discussion. yet it might well
be that you don't have the slightest ambition to be
a serious opponent in a serious discussion ...

nevertheless, since you seem to be so informed, may
i ask you if you know a good documentation which takes
out the air of the conspiracy theories?
 
Quote from man:

you were unable to write a single post without bashing.
no matter if you are right or wrong, it disqualifies you
as a serious opponent in a discussion. yet it might well
be that you don't have the slightest ambition to be
a serious opponent in a serious discussion ...

nevertheless, since you seem to be so informed, may
i ask you if you know a good documentation which takes
out the air of the conspiracy theories?

http://www.911myths.com/

http://www.debunking911.com/
 
Quote from man:

you were unable to write a single post without bashing.
no matter if you are right or wrong, it disqualifies you
as a serious opponent in a discussion. yet it might well
be that you don't have the slightest ambition to be
a serious opponent in a serious discussion ...

nevertheless, since you seem to be so informed, may
i ask you if you know a good documentation which takes
out the air of the conspiracy theories?

A serious discussion? How could this possibly be a serious discussion? Anyone, and I mean anyone who would even consider that we blew up our own buildings and killed almost 4000 people so we could go to war with Iraq is simply just a complete idiot. There is no other way to explain that.

That would mean we knew long in advance that they would hit the WTC with airplanes. We would have had to place a hell of a lot of C4 well in advance of the planes hitting the buidings. There would have literally been thousands of people aware of this. Yet we have people that actually want to have a serious discussion on it? Based on what? Because the floors pancaked and looked like a demolition? When there is enough heat to weaken or melt steel THAT HOLDS UP THE FLOORS, the floors are going to pancake because nothing is holding them up. Each floor becomes heavier and heavier as the floors combine. The buildings floors were not made to withstand that kind of weight.

No one in the government can keep a secret anymore. Everything gets leaked to the press at one time or another shortly after it is discussed, yet a mission like this would involve an enormous amount of people and no one has even felt a little guilty that they knew we did this? This is not the 60's. Things get exposed before it even becomes a truth. Shit happens. Everything is not a conspiracy just because you don't like the president. And really, that is all this is really about. Those that hate George Bush use the internet to come up with all sorts of crap, some may be true, but the bulk is crap, but since it is what the Bush haters want to hear, it keeps coming.

OVER AND OUT!!!!
 
version77, hiroshi, and holygrail:

911-inside-job-ostrich-head-in-sand.jpgv0dvj1.jpg
 
This is like all other antiscience/pseudoscience discussions.

Someone comes up with some extraordinary claim of "new discovery," or "miracle," or "conspiracy." When people dismiss the idea because of its absurdity, he retorts back, "show me the evidence that my theory is wrong."

Dude, the burden of proof is on you! You make a claim, you provide the evidence. You make an extraordinary claim, you provide the extraordinary evidence.

We don't need to prove you wrong. You're assumed wrong unless you can convince us otherwise. This is how science works.
 
The best explanation I've heard regarding why people come up with CT is our inability to accept how random violence can be, and how vulnerable we are to it, every last one of us regardless of position. In a free society we are subject to these random acts and that's just the price we pay. Much as we do, we cannot prevent a determined person(s) from committing these acts, especially when those people don't care if they're caught and/or die in the process. This has been true from Oswald to 9/11, and beyond. Those that look for the truth will find the truth, but if it doesn't fit their personal agenda, well then, they just make shit up, using whatever elements of the real truth that fits their story. With the advent of the internet this has grown exponentially. I fully expect our society to collapse should we not be able to get a handle on this. There are now generations of people that get all, ALL, of their "facts" from the net and even more sadly, movies, where "dramatic license" trumps the real events. We can only expect more to come.
 
Back
Top