Quote from CaptainObvious:
More crazy ass CT:
No planes anywhere on 9/11?
Due to the success of the "no plane at Pentagon" claim, several successor claims of "no planes" were floated, but none were as popular as the original. These efforts include the "webfairy" theory that there wasn't a plane at the World Trade Center north tower (even though the photos of the hole in the tower clearly show the impact of the wings), that the plane that hit the South Tower was some sort of military plane with "pods" that were firing missiles at the building (the only evidence for the "missile" claim is blurry low resolution video that could easily have been altered with software), and even a claim that there wasn't a plane crash in Pennsylvania.
The "no plane at the towers" campaign didn't fly, partially because the idea for the missile masked by a King Kong sized hologram of a plane at the North Tower is ridiculous. So the next version of "no plane" was a claim that the plane that hit the South Tower was swapped in mid-flight with military plane that crashed into the tower, carrying a "pod" under the plane that fired a missile at the building just before crashing into it. Variations on the "pod" is that it was a bomb or perhaps a remote controlled flight system. (Of course, none of the pod people can explain why the military conspirators wouldn't have merely placed these devices in the plane itself, or why the plane would be unable to penetrate the towers without first firing a missile. It is amazing how much time can be spent refuting this endless flood of nonsense, which is probabaly the purpose behind this propaganda.) The "pod" plane claims have not had substantial impact, since they are strange, based on fuzzy pictures and have been clearly refuted by the 9/11 truth movement - the pod is merely a carefully chosen photo of the normal "fairing" bulge between the wing and the fuselage.
Some more crap:
A couple minor variations on the pod hoax are that it was not firing missiles, but was really a bomb or perhaps a remote controlled flight system (if the planes were remote controlled, the altered navigational systems would have been made in or near the cockpit - this claim is a means to discredit the probable reality of remote control on 9/11). None of the pod people suggested why the military conspirators wouldn't have merely placed these devices in the plane itself, why no one noticed the pod and/or missile until they pointed it out, or why the plane would have been unable to penetrate the towers without first firing a missile.
It is amazing how much time can be spent refuting this endless flood of nonsense, which is probably the purpose for this propaganda.
Perhaps one day there will be "no building" theories offered as part of this information warfare attack.
Hey! Maybe that's it! There were no Twin Towers! It was all an illusion. A giant hologram put up since 1974. To what end will the evil Bush aliens go too?
