What really happened ....11 september

Quote from Maverick1:

Your logic and reasoning is very weak. You are building your argument on a logical fallacy. The existence and possibility of transformers blowing up in fires does not preclude the existence and possibility of explosives. That is an obvious either/or fallacy in reasoning.

Just because transformers may have blown up does not de facto imply that explosives were not used.


What reasoning?

I was merely asking whether or not transformers blow. You did the rest yourself. I would call THAT weak.....

Because I'm not ruling out the possibility of explosives - you seem to infer this from.... what?

But to finish the thought, if one admits that transformers blew, then there also is the possibility that ALL the explosions were. Not for sure, but possible?
 
Quote from Haroki:

1- it's possible

2- no

What statements did I make?

The above reasoning Haroki (point 1), to answer your question.

I am relieved to see that you understand that the possibility of transformer explosions does not rule out the possibility of explosives.

Yet I am shocked that you would dig yourself into the hole of arguing that everyone of the explosions heard is possibly attributable to the transformers. We are not dealing with possibilities here, but rather probabilities, because without the scientific method we are severely hampered in our efforts to uncover the truth. So I would suggest to you, that you think deeply about the probability of each one of those explosions reported being from transformers blowing up.
 
Quote from Maverick1:

The above reasoning Haroki (point 1), to answer your question.

I am relieved to see that you understand that the possibility of transformer explosions does not rule out the possibility of explosives.

Yet I am shocked that you would dig yourself into the hole of arguing that everyone of the explosions heard is possibly attributable to the transformers. We are not dealing with possibilities here, but rather probabilities, because without the scientific method we are severely hampered in our efforts to uncover the truth. So I would suggest to you, that you think deeply about the probability of each one of those explosions reported being from transformers blowing up.

Transformers aren't the only source.

Snapping steel, for instance....
 
Quote from Haroki:

During the pancake, the floors acted like a plunger in a Syringe.....

ok... nobody tell karoki that his side abandoned the pancake theory awhile back. lmaoooooooo

pancakes.jpg
 
Quote from Bitstream:

that's the problem u see, intellectual honesty is nowhere to be seen around here, especially if u are dealing with staunch neokons supporters.

Pardon me sir, but your paranoia is showing...

So skeptics of the alternative story/believers of the official story are neocon supporters?

If so, I believe you need to put your trading guru ZZZzzzz in that group, and I hardly believe he's a neocon supporter...
 
Quote from ratboy88:

ok... nobody tell karoki that his side abandoned the pancake theory awhile back. lmaoooooooo

[

Please expand your statement....

I believe - but not sure - that the OS is that the collapse caused the pancaking.

Correct me if I'm in error.

Oh, and include a link so that I can read it, otherwise, it's all just

PFFFFFFT
 
Back
Top