Quote from Maverick1:
Your logic and reasoning is very weak. You are building your argument on a logical fallacy. The existence and possibility of transformers blowing up in fires does not preclude the existence and possibility of explosives. That is an obvious either/or fallacy in reasoning.
Just because transformers may have blown up does not de facto imply that explosives were not used.
Quote from Haroki:
1- it's possible
2- no
What statements did I make?
Quote from Maverick1:
Further, probably the most troubling evidence suggesting the use of explosives is the near free fall speed of the towers, which should have taken much longer than 9 seconds to collapse if it was a structural failure.
Quote from Maverick1:
The above reasoning Haroki (point 1), to answer your question.
I am relieved to see that you understand that the possibility of transformer explosions does not rule out the possibility of explosives.
Yet I am shocked that you would dig yourself into the hole of arguing that everyone of the explosions heard is possibly attributable to the transformers. We are not dealing with possibilities here, but rather probabilities, because without the scientific method we are severely hampered in our efforts to uncover the truth. So I would suggest to you, that you think deeply about the probability of each one of those explosions reported being from transformers blowing up.
Quote from Bitstream:
that's the problem u see, intellectual honesty is nowhere to be seen around here, especially if u are dealing with staunch neokons supporters.
Quote from ratboy88:
ok... nobody tell karoki that his side abandoned the pancake theory awhile back. lmaoooooooo
[