What really happened ....11 september

Quote from Avid_Consumer:

and here are some stocking stuffers
http://www.wanttoknow.info/officialsquestion911commissionreport
More...

Amazing how many crazy looking people you can get on one web page...

If even ONE of them had any real evidence (and they don't) that
there was any CRIME committed on 9/11, then where is the evidence?

Where is it?

Until there is EVIDENCE OF A CRIME, IT IS ALL BS... Nothing but BS...

P.S. I like the way that one guy thinks:

As soon as we invaded Iraq, I knew 9/11 was an inside job.

Pretty smart thinking there huh?

I don't remember the US blowing up the WTC the first time we went to Iraq...duh...
 
Quote from version77:

Rat "boy" you just "outed" yourself by typing in your fantasy here at ET.

I guess you don't know anything about psychology since you didn't go to college? LOL...:D
More...

awwwwwww.. poor little virgin77.... thinks he knows psychology... how cute.
 
Quote from version77:


I don't remember the US blowing up the WTC the first time we went to Iraq...duh...
More...

thats right.. it was the fake "dead babies in incubators: that we invaded for. lmaoooooooooo
 
Quote from ratboy88:

thats right.. it was the fake "dead babies in incubators: that we invaded for. lmaoooooooooo
More...

ladybabe77 has zero cerdibility, they guy bot into franz from ti brilliance and even attended to his chat room, maybe forking out thousands of bucks...when we tried to warn et he was a fraud this tool played defence attorney for ti right to the very end...i mean, he aint exactly the most intuitive guy around innit.
 
Quote from Avid_Consumer:

lol give that statement a little more thought bud
More...

lmao, yeah there's enough to go around to build a solid case in court. juries have convicted criminals with much lesser evidence.
 
Quote from Avid_Consumer:

lol give that statement a little more thought bud
More...

according to Virgin77: evidence of crime = when Bill Oreilly says it is a crime!!!
 
Quote from Avid_Consumer:



read this from top to bottom. do you find anything illogical or unreasonable in this view
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Craig_Roberts
More...


yeah, you're relying on an economist for your "incontrovertible" facts about the physics of free falling buildings.

Roberts, a supply-side economist, comments on the "scientific impossibility" of the official explanation for the events on 9/11 and says those engineers and physicists, who accept this theory are wrong. On August 18, 2006, he wrote:

The economist disputes the findings of engineers and physicists regarding the physics of free-falling buildings..... THERE'S YOUR PROOF!

The WTC building was one-of-a-kind structure, IT HAD NO INTERNAL STEEL-BEAM SUPPORT STRUCTURE. By the way, the building DID PANCAKE...... WE ALL SAW IT PANCAKE

douche bags and assholes, each of you tinfoil hat wearers. Lord knows how you make it through the day.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top