Quote from man:
no video as of now. but you got the logic wrong on the
occam thing. the question is which solution fits easiest
with the observations, not whether that solution is
easy by itself. you get me on that? in order to make the
solution possible you need massive effort for a demo,
yet you know perfectly well it is possible. but for the plane
only theory you need to draw several factors together
to make it possible. so at least the demo claim has
some validity worth looking at.
and if one applies your logic: it was not easy to arrange
flying two planes into the building either. seems
to qualify for "massive undertaking" as well.
From Wiki:
Occam's razor states that the explanation of any phenomenon should make as few assumptions as possible, eliminating, or "shaving off", those that make no difference in the observable predictions of the explanatory hypothesis or theory. In short, when given two equally valid explanations for a phenomenon, one should embrace the less complicated formulation.
So now I guess it comes down to what was less complicated.....
1. Terrorists decide to teach America a lesson-they decide to fly planes into buildings.
2.they come to America and take some flying lessons. they can't take off and land for shit , but they can fly...
3.US intelligence isn't able to talk the FBI to prevent it-Gorelick's little contribution.
4. and anyways, being in the US and taking flying lessons isn't against the law, so it would be dificult to arrest them anyway.
5. they succed, the buildings burn enough to warp the joists, causing failure of 1, then 2,3,4 joists. and a chainreaction results that brings down all 3 , similarly built buildings.
or
1.Neocons decide they need a new PH to enact the changes that will result in some mystical new world order where they will be able to control everyone's life , with the help of Mossad, the International Zionists Bankers Union, etc, etc...
2.they also decide they need to invade Iraq to secure its' oil. and hey let's throw up a smoke screen in Afghanistan too to hide our true intentions of wanting to line the pockets of our oil buddies. so don't forget to incriminate al-quaeda
3.let's wire up all 3 buildings now with explosives, but be sure to drop then in their own footprints, because we want to minimize the losses. and besides, according to our demo experts, all buildings fall that way, so it shouldn't cause any suspicion..
4.ok boys, we're gonna power down WTC 1and 2 for 5 days, get Jeb's advice on how to fix it up, after all, he was part owner of a security frm that worked there once.
5. let's go wire it up, it should only take us 2-300 guys to get it done in 5 days? good, we're the govt, and we're not what others think we are and so it shouldn't be a problem. and oh yeah, nobody can ever leak it out, like what's happening over at that damn CIA every other week...
6. shoot, we forgot about the people on the plane. well let's buy them off, we're sure that none of them ever want to see their family again. get them to make some fake phone calls too...
7. ok , we wired them up 5,6,7 days ago, let's wait until Tuesday to blow it. that way, it's all day monday for some janitor to find our explosives. and if they don't, we're good.....
8. do we have the remote controls all ready on the planes? good. do we have some passports and body parts from the people we paid off to throw around at the crash sites? good.
9. looks like we're good to go.....
When you look at the entire plan there, it kinda falls apart using Occam, eh?