What really happened ....11 september
- Thread starter NickBarings
- Start date
I appluad all those who run conspiracy sites and write conspiracy books and sell conspiracy DVDs etc etc. Could there be any easier way to make money than to take advantage of these lunatics?
i think there should be an official debate. taking place
in april 2007 in a washington conference room with
TV stations broadcasting live. material to be presented
by each side, the offical and the conspiracy, must be
put on the table at least eight weeks in advance.
i think this could only make democracy stronger. and
if it turns out that official arguments are real convincing,
then many thanks to the conspiracy community which
enforced government to BE convincing.
while i see several weak spots in the conspiracy claims,
i would think that the official WTC7 case is difficult
either. it is really an unbelievable structural weakness
if three buildings fall apart the same unprecedented
way in two completely different ways. and while i see
the point that different circumstances can add up
together and have a certain unlikely effect i would like
to stick to occam's law: in doubt the simpler solution is
the more likely. so, when three buildings look like as
being demolished intentionally, then this option should
at least be investigated as heavily as the one with
various circumstances coming together.
but having said that, i still doubt the conspiracy claim,
since the initial rationale of the trade is too risky a
strategy for a government to be uncovered. if you
want to go to war you do that differently. not at home
with live cameras on all over the place.
i would see at least some of the conspiracy claims
analogeous to curve fitting: yes, if you add enough
unconnected dots, you might think you have something.
and to a newbie it might sound convincing ...
in april 2007 in a washington conference room with
TV stations broadcasting live. material to be presented
by each side, the offical and the conspiracy, must be
put on the table at least eight weeks in advance.
i think this could only make democracy stronger. and
if it turns out that official arguments are real convincing,
then many thanks to the conspiracy community which
enforced government to BE convincing.
while i see several weak spots in the conspiracy claims,
i would think that the official WTC7 case is difficult
either. it is really an unbelievable structural weakness
if three buildings fall apart the same unprecedented
way in two completely different ways. and while i see
the point that different circumstances can add up
together and have a certain unlikely effect i would like
to stick to occam's law: in doubt the simpler solution is
the more likely. so, when three buildings look like as
being demolished intentionally, then this option should
at least be investigated as heavily as the one with
various circumstances coming together.
but having said that, i still doubt the conspiracy claim,
since the initial rationale of the trade is too risky a
strategy for a government to be uncovered. if you
want to go to war you do that differently. not at home
with live cameras on all over the place.
i would see at least some of the conspiracy claims
analogeous to curve fitting: yes, if you add enough
unconnected dots, you might think you have something.
and to a newbie it might sound convincing ...
Alex Jones today (Sunday) at 4 to 6 pm CST on KLBJ streaming radio............
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=82391
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=82391
So you think that demo would be the simpler solution - Occam's Razor....
Go to Implosionworld .com and see how much is involved in demoing a building. In the case of bringing down a building that was a 1/4 mile high, it would've been a MASSIVE undertaking. How is that simpler?
Find any videos yet?
Exactly....
Dumbo says that the CT web sites don't make any money. And then someone else posts an mp3 of Jones that has a commercial 10 minutes in. Uhhhh, earth to lunatics, THAT"S where they make their money. Ya know, increase your listenership, and increase your revenues through advestisements.......
I have listened to Alex Jones since 1996 and I can tell you that he is NOT AT ALL as you try to portray........he is one of that last few who knows what a responsible citizen under our Constitution is suppose to be doing. Alex Jones is by no means rich in wealth, but he is extremely rich in honor and righteousness.