Plenty of MGM done by christians in America. I don't hear you crying foul over our rampant use of it on American babies.
What really died at Auschwitz? Interesting Viewpoint....
- Thread starter Scataphagos
- Start date
Plenty of MGM done by christians in America. I don't hear you crying foul over our rampant use of it on American babies.
And you’re the poster child for Cuckolding.
This reply merely indicates to me that you are personally lost in a world of bs and can't see what OP is posting for what it really is ( there is no doubt and no need for debate he's been posting this shit for years ).
Last edited:
You are a degenerate that I don't respect at all.
Weak reply.
Is that because you know you don’t have a strong argument? One can benefit in an argument whether their ideas are validated or not. For example, if you win a well contested argument, it gives more validation to your point of view and more confidence you are on the right track. If the other side prevails in an argument using sound reasoning, you benefit by understanding the issue better and having increased credibility by not repeating weak arguments.
It is intellectually inconsistent for you to take the time to read and post in a political forum to convey your ideas, but back away from a challenge.
Hopefully you will see this logic and support your points on your counter to the OP’s post.
"Look at any donors’ board at any symphony, art museum, theater, art gallery, science centre, etc. You will see many, many, Jewish surnames"
Sure but the article conveniently leaves out that Jewish names were also on most money lenders, banks, corporates, media empires, in politics, sports promoters, and that Germany and a number other European countries were hardly German or French or what have you, but controlled by Jewish families that enriched themselves at the expense of the general population in the 1910s/20s and well before that. This does not in any way justify violence of any sort (putting this in before I am accused of being antisemitic) but it definitely explains the sentiment in the general population before the Holocaust. Jewish families on shabbat walked the boardwalks of the city, entire family holding hands and forcing everyone else to make a circle around them and walk on the street. Jewish banks and money lenders charged outrageous interest rates and lending cartels ensured rates were agreed among Jewish lenders. That and many similar stories were accounts of the perception in the population at that time, chronicled by many historians. Tens of millions of people don't just look away when a population is literally ethnically cleansed. But all we hear in today's media is all the good Jewish families contributed to society 100 years ago. Sure they did but what about the bad? Guess who controls all those media outlets today? Same than 100 years ago.
Sure but the article conveniently leaves out that Jewish names were also on most money lenders, banks, corporates, media empires, in politics, sports promoters, and that Germany and a number other European countries were hardly German or French or what have you, but controlled by Jewish families that enriched themselves at the expense of the general population in the 1910s/20s and well before that. This does not in any way justify violence of any sort (putting this in before I am accused of being antisemitic) but it definitely explains the sentiment in the general population before the Holocaust. Jewish families on shabbat walked the boardwalks of the city, entire family holding hands and forcing everyone else to make a circle around them and walk on the street. Jewish banks and money lenders charged outrageous interest rates and lending cartels ensured rates were agreed among Jewish lenders. That and many similar stories were accounts of the perception in the population at that time, chronicled by many historians. Tens of millions of people don't just look away when a population is literally ethnically cleansed. But all we hear in today's media is all the good Jewish families contributed to society 100 years ago. Sure they did but what about the bad? Guess who controls all those media outlets today? Same than 100 years ago.
Last edited:
I don't hate Jews but I am well aware of the abuse by many Jewish families in power in Europe 100 years ago. I don't hate Muslims today but I am well aware of some Muslim extremists and their intolerance and unwillingness to respect local laws and customs.
So what, is the thought police gonna pick me up now because I dared say something bad about a certain minority of a minority? Some white people 200-300 years ago behaved horrifically, they were called slave owners. Guess what, some presidents held slaves and their painting hangs in the white house to this day. Some white folks today behave horribly. Why do certain people get outraged about anything of their choosing?
The worst sin committed today is people defining terms any way they want. "oh damn you, you said something critical of Jews,, I therefore label you antisemitic". OP leans a certain way, politically, not my cup of tea, but I don't believe OP outright declared war on all Muslims in the entire world. If I understand OP correctly he respects Muslims as long as they stay in their own countries, or if some immigrate that the numbers are proportional to other immigrants and in accordance with how many a society can accommodate without changing the social and ethnic fabric of an entire culture. That is how I understand OP. Heck, I am even on his ignore list and defend him. Who cares, I try to focus on issues not people
So what, is the thought police gonna pick me up now because I dared say something bad about a certain minority of a minority? Some white people 200-300 years ago behaved horrifically, they were called slave owners. Guess what, some presidents held slaves and their painting hangs in the white house to this day. Some white folks today behave horribly. Why do certain people get outraged about anything of their choosing?
The worst sin committed today is people defining terms any way they want. "oh damn you, you said something critical of Jews,, I therefore label you antisemitic". OP leans a certain way, politically, not my cup of tea, but I don't believe OP outright declared war on all Muslims in the entire world. If I understand OP correctly he respects Muslims as long as they stay in their own countries, or if some immigrate that the numbers are proportional to other immigrants and in accordance with how many a society can accommodate without changing the social and ethnic fabric of an entire culture. That is how I understand OP. Heck, I am even on his ignore list and defend him. Who cares, I try to focus on issues not people
Last edited:
I always feel that if you immigrate to a country you background and culture can certainly add to the beauty and depth of your newly adopted country but the movement to bring 100% of your customs and beliefs and make them ingrained fully in your new country to where you want to supplant anything local for your own is where the negative stereotype and problems are created.
Assimlation does not mean turn your back on where you came from or your culture/traditions, but blend this into the country you have chosed to move to to add, never subtract. Sadly many communities setting up in Europe have no interest in assimilating despite the open arms treatment of their hosts to welcome them in and the benefits they could bring. Now, in many communities the rejection of assimilation has createdthese pockets of isolation that is not welcome.
Assimlation does not mean turn your back on where you came from or your culture/traditions, but blend this into the country you have chosed to move to to add, never subtract. Sadly many communities setting up in Europe have no interest in assimilating despite the open arms treatment of their hosts to welcome them in and the benefits they could bring. Now, in many communities the rejection of assimilation has createdthese pockets of isolation that is not welcome.
you are sick... in a demented pre fascist way.
this is not a cultural equivalence argument ...
do you support child rape and FGM?
address the argument...
I would like to point out what is going on here.
The lefties here are not even allowing themselves to call out human rights abuses against children?
Nobody should support any system... religious or otherwise which tortures children.
I really have trouble believe everyone can't condemn human rights abuses...
this is not a cultural equivalence argument ...
do you support child rape and FGM?
address the argument...
I would like to point out what is going on here.
The lefties here are not even allowing themselves to call out human rights abuses against children?
Nobody should support any system... religious or otherwise which tortures children.
I really have trouble believe everyone can't condemn human rights abuses...
Last edited:
I'm no going to debate the merits of clear racist content, I'm going to condemn it and move on. I have no idea why you support this content.