Quote from DHOHHI:
What's your obsession with FAILURE? Is it due to you failing yourself in an attempt to make a living as a trader?
I've traded full time, with success, for 15 years. I started with apprehensions - Can I do this? Can I succeed? Well, for the past 10 years I've found time to take time away from trading to volunteer with tutoring & mentoring at local schools. The past 4 years I've taken 3 afternoons/week to work with inner city disadvantaged kids in math and other areas and at the same time have maintained, and increased profitability as a trader.
I'm sorry you apparently failed at the endeavor -- but not everyone does fail.
Trading is about making money.
All frequent traders lose, so losses are a big concern.
You don't daytrade.
You are only a broker shill pretending to be succesful so that customers don't realize all datraders lose and there has never been a succesful day trader in the long run.
Quote from Visaria:
Assuming a daytrader is losing money, it's an important question. If a large proportion of the losses are because of commissions, the trader has to change his strategy e.g. trade less, higher time frames, perhaps different instruments.
Even if s/he isn't losing, you still need to look at how much is going to the broker.
Of course it'a an important matter.
Quote from Fireplace:
Are you even vaguely familiar with Crgarcia? He proclaims that ALL short term and swing trades are losers, that there is not a single one in the world that is profitable.
Yes, this is absolutely true.
Quote from Bob111:
one more proof that you are brainless idiot,who can't even distinct losses and expenses. in trading commissions are necessary business expenses. just like expenses on gas for cab driver,if this would make any sense to you,you fucking retard
This is a meaningless detail.
Losses are losses:
You have $100k into your account with turns into $1k
You have nothing but to insult me as deep inside you know trading it's a scam.
I am stating this, you know its true and truth infuriates you.
In short we can conclude that deep inside Bob111 agrees with my posts.

)