s-son of a..s-s-son....son of a....son of a b..b....b...b..b...b....b.....b......b...bitch
i meant to say if
i meant to say if
What motivates the attacks on J Hershey?
- Thread starter Fractals 'R Us
- Start date
I guess mama duck dropped you on your head a few times, explains why your chart reading skills are so poor. Not to worry, you'll fit in very well on ET, most people here can't read charts either, including your boyfriend rawfits
lol ..... are you saying..... here and now.... that YOU can read a Hershey chart????
The American Science Council for Mathematics has had a 1 million dollar reward for anyone that can come forward and prove they can read a Hershey chart...... no one has yet claimed that prize money. Some of the top physicists in the world tried and failed.
and just because rawfits attacks Jack doesnt mean hes on my side.... far from it
Look at the chart that Trader666 posts ad nauseum for NTES, see that she shows Jack went long and the next day price GAPPED UP. It doesnt matter if you placed this trade or anyone else on ET did. The fact remains, the market attempted to validate the trade but failed to confirm. No big deal, the market allowed for exit w/o any damage to P&L. Its not a Hershey chart with lines everywhere, its a NORMAL candle chart.
Based on your responses so far, you seem not to understand that a GAP UP the following day after taking a long position is a good thing. I would totally agree w/ 666 if he entered and the market tanked against him after taking the trade but the fact remains that it DID NOT and exiting the trade should not have led to a loss.
Think about it Duck, would you like your incorrect trades to allow you to exit w/o losing $$$ as this one did or would you prefer to lose significant money when you are wrong? I suggest you learn about inflection points and how to spot them as these are the safest entry points.
Based on your responses so far, you seem not to understand that a GAP UP the following day after taking a long position is a good thing. I would totally agree w/ 666 if he entered and the market tanked against him after taking the trade but the fact remains that it DID NOT and exiting the trade should not have led to a loss.
Think about it Duck, would you like your incorrect trades to allow you to exit w/o losing $$$ as this one did or would you prefer to lose significant money when you are wrong? I suggest you learn about inflection points and how to spot them as these are the safest entry points.
apparently you didnt read my comment on that particular trade............... i agreed with the entry... and even commented that there were at least 3 to 4 technical reasons to enter just by looking at that chart. You see....... I just dont agree or disagree with others based on whose "side" they're on................... a pity the same can not be said for SCT traders
Ok, fine. But apparently you didn't read my comment where I said it didn't matter WHO entered this trade and also that I would AGREE with Trader666 if Jack entered the trade and it went against him from the outset. You see, if Jack makes a dumb trade, then he deserves ridicule. I'm not pro-anyone blindly, I let the merits of what they do or say speak for themselves (and I don't mean PROOF in terms of P&L). There are several traders on ET that have zero to do with Jack that I have a lot of respect for based on their posts (Profitaknfool comes to mind).
