But, to answer the OP's worrisome question, which is the precursor to recession? That is, which is more palpable/predictable? 20% stock market correction or two consecutive quarters of negative GDP? Without a doubt, 20% correction has almost always served as a precursor to recession.We already had that in 2018. A recession is classically defined as two consecutive quarters of negative GDP, as of this typing.
I'm neither an economist nor a statistician, but I know from trading the past 2 recessions (2000 and 2008) that steep stock market correction usually precedes the recession. As they say, "The Stock Market Looks Forward, the Economy Looks Back".Is what we're witnessing right now, a 1,000 point move above that "recession precursor" a "natural" occurrence?
In a bubble, everything become frothy. Market is no exception. Come to think of it, when have we ever seen the market rise for 7 CONSECUTIVE years making nonstop ATHs? From the 2008 high (just prior to the subprime debacle), S&P has gained 1,601%. From the low of 2009 aka Great Recession, it made 2,671%. Some folks think this is normal. Go figure.In previous occurrences, how %often has there been a 50% rebound from a 20% correction? Is it normal for a 50% rebound, in this case, 1k point spike from a 20% correction to occur so fast (from Jan 2019 to Jan 2020 = 1 year)?
It took over 25 years to recover the losses from the Great Depression (85% drop from the top), whereas it took only 5 years to recover from the Great Recession (58% drop).As an uneducated person, I would think the activity would be more towards the downside, or ranging at best, after a 20% correction - for a considerable amount of time (~1 year). But what do I know.