What it looks like when you do not get an HQ SPECIAL

exGOPer said:
But by that logic, why can't the President be accused of breaking the law? He is an employee of the government as well?




That's just bad logic.

Using private email system is legal, she used a private email system.

Some of the emails contained classified information that were not properly marked, that's a problem for those who sent that information because they didn't mark it - not those who received. And anything Hillary herself sent is for herself to decide whether it's classified or not being an OCA. The law doesnt implicate her in anyway otherwise it would implicate dozens of people who emailed her with the info as well.

But there is even a more important point, EVEN IF she used the state.gov email system, that is still an unclassified channel and the same scenario would have happened. So she would have violated the law for using either of the systems?
More...

Yes, some of the emails had their markings removed, (we've already covered this) and some did not. There were many in her server with classified notation, others (and again it's known that content not markings or ones opinion classifies documents) were so sensitive in nature, Hillary knew they were classified regardless of markings.

Quit being naive and playing childish word games. Everyone that handled these emails and documents knew what the hell they were doing, documents that are on secured servers don't magically appear on non-secured servers without knowledge.

Go peddle your line of BS somewhere else.
 
Wallet said:
Yes, some of the emails had their markings removed, (we've already covered this) and some did not.
More...

Citation needed for this because that's a definite crime and I never heard of this before

Wallet said:
There were many in her server with classified notation, others (and again it's known that content not markings or ones opinion classifies documents) were so sensitive in nature, Hillary knew they were classified regardless of markings.
More...

This is false

MATT CARTWRIGHT: You were asked about markings on a few documents, I have the manual here, marking national classified security information. And I don't think you were given a full chance to talk about those three documents with the little c's on them. Were they properly documented? Were they properly marked according to the manual?

JAMES COMEY: No. [...]

MATT CARTWRIGHT: **According to the manual, if you're going to classify something, there has to be a header on the document? Right?**

JAMES COMEY: **Correct.**

MATT CARTWRIGHT: Was there a header on the three documents that we've discussed today that had the little c in the text someplace?

JAMES COMEY: No. There were three e-mails, the c was in the body, in the text, but there was no header on the email or in the text.

MATT CARTWRIGHT: **So if Secretary Clinton really were an expert about what's classified and what's not classified and we're following the manual, the absence of a header would tell her immediately that those three documents were not classified. Am I correct in that?**

JAMES COMEY:**That would be a reasonable inference.**

http://www.mediaite.com/online/fbi-...n-emails-were-not-properly-marked-classified/

Wallet said:
Quit being naive and playing childish word games. Everyone that handled these emails and documents knew what the hell they were doing, documents that are on secured servers don't magically appear on non-secured servers without knowledge.

Go peddle your line of BS somewhere else.
More...

So what were they doing exactly? They knowingly sent classified information with what intent? What was the harm done specifically for them to be punished?

What exactly is the BS here? If they committed a crime then why aren't they being prosecuted by Trump's DOJ?

All you are doing is peddling outrage, that's all you guys do every day even when in power. Prosecute people or stop whining all the time is my advice.
 
There is little point debating with the leftist, other than for entertainment. The following is a complete sentence in the mind of the leftist.
"there is no way Hillary could break the law"...
It matters not what one may write after that statement, in the mind of the leftist it is impossible for Hillary Clinton to break the law. Facts and evidence are inconsequential. Besides, Comey said she didn't intend to do anything wrong. For most anyone else intent would be irrelevant, but for the chosen few it's a free pass.
 
You guys are debating something that was settled and then reviewed by Trump’s own people. The fbi looked into this and so did congress.

It’s over. There is no debate.
 
CaptainObvious said:
There is little point debating with the leftist, other than for entertainment. The following is a complete sentence in the mind of the leftist.
"there is no way Hillary could break the law"...
It matters not what one may write after that statement, in the mind of the leftist it is impossible for Hillary Clinton to break the law. Facts and evidence are inconsequential. Besides, Comey said she didn't intend to do anything wrong. For most anyone else intent would be irrelevant, but for the chosen few it's a free pass.
More...

Jeff Sessions co-signed what Comey said before congress. Get over it.
 
[QUOTE="UsualName, post: 4577085, member: 501368" The fbi looked into this
[/QUOTE]




The FBI did not look into squat. That's why it is not over and the ugly snake is raising its head bigtime again. 2018 is going to be a big year for issues that the FBI did not look in to.
 
TreeFrogTrader said:
[QUOTE="UsualName, post: 4577085, member: 501368" The fbi looked into this
More...




The FBI did not look into squat. That's why it is not over and the ugly snake is raising its head bigtime again. 2018 is going to be a big year for issues that the FBI did not look in to.[/QUOTE]

Yeah, right.
 
UsualName said:
Yeah, right.
More...



Huma is off to a great start this year.

You know how women love attention.


giggle


199808.jpg
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top