What is wrong with this picture? Is the total loss really 27%? Or is it much higher?
Technically - yes. But put and call spreads are the same trade - they form an iron condor. Calculating gains on each one of them is meaningless. If one of them gained 5% and the second one lost 100% - the iron condor still lost 100%. Doing an average of 6 positions is extremely misleading.The "Results" column percentage basis is the $2 spread width for each underlying.
(So, that much is consistent.)
Otherwise,
To put things in context, it is a screenshot from one of the options advisory services. This is how they manipulate their track record, and this is why people consider this industry so corrupted.


Total credit was 0.48 on three $2 wide iron condors. So the risk was 600-48=552
Total debit: 3.61 Total loss: 3.13, 56.7% loss on the risk capital.
Well, this is not the correct way to calculate P/L. Getting 0.50 credit on $2 spread is not the same as getting the same credit on $5 spread, so the P/L will not be the same.Or if you consider loss as percentage of premium received... ouch!