A book by Laurence Connors, "Trading Connors VIX Reversals"
The basic premise appears to be that the value of the VIX is not as important in and of itself, as compared to the fact that the VIX is supposedly mean reverting. That is, if it gets extended far beyond the 5, 10, or 20 day moving average, that it has a high probability to move back towards the value of the moving average.
In the past, I had a few occasions to apply the CVR setups 1, 3, 6, and 7 for the QQQ's by using VXN.X as the indicator.
However, I have noticed that sometimes the signals may be premature, perhaps by a day or two. But sometimes dead on. I never place value on these unless there are at least two confirming setups and three are better, which rarely happens. The main problem I am aware of using these setups, is that there can be some serious drawdowns. And because of this, I am not totally confident relying on these setups alone unless there are other confirming reasons.
The basic premise appears to be that the value of the VIX is not as important in and of itself, as compared to the fact that the VIX is supposedly mean reverting. That is, if it gets extended far beyond the 5, 10, or 20 day moving average, that it has a high probability to move back towards the value of the moving average.
In the past, I had a few occasions to apply the CVR setups 1, 3, 6, and 7 for the QQQ's by using VXN.X as the indicator.
However, I have noticed that sometimes the signals may be premature, perhaps by a day or two. But sometimes dead on. I never place value on these unless there are at least two confirming setups and three are better, which rarely happens. The main problem I am aware of using these setups, is that there can be some serious drawdowns. And because of this, I am not totally confident relying on these setups alone unless there are other confirming reasons.
)
) cents