LOL the people who run the firms now dont care if 40 years from now, due to advances in sciences and technology proves that global warning due to human influences is proven correct. But similar to the ciggarrette companies back in the 40 and 50's who knew that smoking caused cancer and other illnesses but claimed that it was untrue. But due to advances in technology and science it was proven true. I was wondering what are the legal costs to companies. You can even point to other companies that decades later proved to cause illness. I was wondering if it is just worth it now for companies to admit it now, instead of waiting years in the future.