Moral Jesus is a double sided coin whose currency demands that serving your fellow man is serving God, but to do otherwise will result in being "cut in sunder".
Bible Jesus is less than moral, his ethics are more than questionable.
This Messiah doesn't make morality the focus, to serve people because people matter or because they are human beings just like he was supposed to be. No, he offers a violent Hobson's choice. These so called teachings insert a God who on setting the moral standard that people are to do good to each other, immediately proceeds to degrade it, by declaring the only other option is to get bludgeoned with God's own nightstick.
It's a lesson on how to assault people to achieve what you want, not to do good unto others for the sake of doing good alone, for its own reward.
Religion is the act of unnecessarily moving pious belief in front of morality in order to claim it.
Stoicism no different.
It's putting on a blindfold to see light when light is already there. Expecting to see what is right, when what is right is already discernible.
Virtue is its own reward. True morality is morality for its own sake. Filtered through religion, both can only be diminished.
its the Perfect choice.
People who believe in God’s Son are not judged guilty.
On the contrary, it is the opposite of a Hobson's choice.
Have you loved your neighbor as yourself?
is a threat more than anything else, not a moral standard.Its the easiest choice there is.
Choose God.
Adolf Hitler believed in God’s Son.
If you have the choice to either believe in God’s Son and be not judged guilty -or- not believe in God's son and be judged guilty, that is the very definition of Hobson's choice.
Love your neighbor as yourself (unless they are a slave / homosexual etc etc of course) ....or elseis a threat more than anything else, not a moral standard.
By choosing a morally wanting , highly faulty supernatural God along with its questionable rules before what's moral, then you ain't even doing what's moral to begin with.
Easiest choice ain't always the best choice.
Choose morality.
1. the old hitler was a christian so Jesus is not moral canard.
http://www.catholicworldreport.com/2017/10/26/was-hitler-a-christian-an-atheist-or-neither/\
...
However, Weikart makes it clear that Hitler’s pro-Christian statementswere little more than lip serviceto his churchgoing constituents. Although Hitler was born and raised in historically Catholic Austria, he lost his faith in the Church at an early age. Weikart writes that the young Adolf was a rebellious student who frequently quarreled with his high school religion teacher and often mocked Christianity in class. Weikart’s excellent command of German is on display when he notes that in Mein Kampfand in private correspondence Hitler frequently used the term Pfaffe, a disparaging German term for a priest, to refer to clergymen. Hitler’s long-established anti-clericalism was evident after his rise to power as well, when Goebbels’ propaganda machine portrayed the Catholic priesthood as dominated by sexual perverts (on a side note, does that tactic sound familiar?).
In fact, Hitler’s real views on Christianity were so bizarre that they would actually be amusing in their imaginative eccentricity,if not for the fact that they were part of the worldview of a psychopath whose genocidal policies killed 11 million civilians and unleashed the bloodiest war in history. Weikart writes that Hitler, like his favorite philosopher, Nietzsche, disliked Christianity, but admired the figure of Jesus Christ. In Hitler’s view, Jesus himself was a Roman or Greek (Hitler believed that the ancient Greeks and Romans were the precursors of the Nordic “master race”) killed by the perfidious Jews.
You think one(take it - god's grace) or the other (leave it - and be judged - a threat also) is not a take it or leave it?2. the choice avail yourself of God's grace or be judged on your life is not a hobson's choice at all. god's grace or being judge on your own life. that is not a take it or leave it. Perhaps you would get in without Jesus' help.
3. love your neighbor as you would love yourself... period.
It does not matter if they are gay or whatever.
Not saying its easy... but that is what Jesus is one of the 2 great commandments.
4. It makes no sense to call Jesus morally wanting. but, perhaps someday you will desire to avail yourself of his Grace.
You said
"People who believe in God’s Son are not judged guilty. its the Perfect choice.".
Adolf Hitler believed in God’s Son. He made that 'Perfect choice'. Therefore by your own piously arrogant words, Hitler is not judged guilty.
No amount of twisted Catholic apologetics will make what you said reasonable.
You think one(take it - god's grace) or the other (leave it - and be judged - a threat also) is not a take it or leave it?
How come you imagine the choice between worship me or burn in hell is any more worthy a thing to say whether Kim Jong Un or Bible Jesus says it.
Jesus also tells you not to love your neighbor, yourself, your mother, father, son or daughter, more than him. Jesus compares your neighbor to dogs...period.
'If you don't do what I say you'll burn in hell, but I love you' , is a morally wanting Jesus.
By threatening damnation and divine retribution, Bible Jesus shows no grace.
Making excuses for odious demands on any grounds, least of all superstitious religious ones, is by definition, morally wanting.
Whatever your genetic environmental predilection is, you can only be true to your nature. In your heart you will know what is right or wrong. So Jesus is a construct of that sense of right or wrong. Stay true to it, and you are with Jesus. If your sense of right or wrong or lack of, turns you into a demon, than when you come across the righteous, you will be put down.
Hitler's declared belief and faith as he recorded it and professed it was no lip service. It was full hearted and like Jesus, he brought a sword.A belief is not lip service. True belief or faith would guide your actions.
hitler's actions shows no sign of belief in jesus
True belief or faith would guide your actions.