you wrote: "I completed a post-master executive program in finance & control in 2,5 years, for which the nominal duration was 3 years, while working full-time in a senior management position, commuting 2-3 hours a day and going through a divorce. Studied four evenings a week and every sunday, looked like a total zombie according to friends.
One year after graduation I quit and took up trading."
Is that what normal people do? One is in a "senior management position" (your wording), then joins a "post-master executive program" (any more superlatives?), and then you waste the tens if not hundreds of thousands and become a day trader? Am I seeing bullshit where there is not? Then I sincerely apologize...but comments such as yours explain everything I need to know to understand why so many lose in trading. Any an all coherence, logic, determination is missing/lacking.
Sorry you feel offended by the quote "post-master executive program", but this is the wording of the institute that offers the program and after completion you're entitled to the EMFC/RC-degree. In my country it is the most advanced education in the field of Finance and Control, which is only accessible after completing a relevant masters-degree and is a prerequisite for a finance career within listed companies. My employer at the time paid for this education.
I agree on your assessment that it's a very unusual move after completing such a program. Hoewever, at the time I realized I wanted to be my own boss. Given my education and prior experience in the stock market I chose the path of a trading career. I contemplated studying law, but after an exhausting program decided to refrain from that.
But in your last sentence you're again making all kind of assumptions and drawing generalized conclusions although you know nothing about my background, my education, my professional career, my character and so on. You just can't engage in a discussion without throwing insults. Have a nice day.
Last edited: