What is the best way to deal with suicide bombers?

Ninja · Apr 1, 2003

Quote from buzzy2:

So the US government should be unconcerned by attacks like 9/11, or the fact that an oil billionaire tyrant in Iraq has the power and the means to kill Americans?

What a f*cking idiot.

And what does 9/11 has to to with the war against Iraq? (I have never met a person who was against the 'war against terror' in Afghanistan or Al Queda anywhere in the world)

And who is the oil billionaire tyrant in Iraq that has the power and the means to kill Americans? (Apart from the americans who are now in Iraq)

buzzy2 · Apr 1, 2003

Quote from alfonso:

The "power to kill Americans" alone is justification for a war?

YES, the intention is enough....

Alfonso, go keep ruining and bloodsucking dry your own country,

Americans don't need to hear sh*t from people like you...

and for the idiot Ninja:

9/11 is relevant because since 9/11 America will no longer wait to see the body bags with Americans before striking its enemies.

alfonso · Apr 1, 2003

Quote from Ninja:

(I have never met a person who was against the 'war against terror')

Ninja, let me introduce myself.

"War on Terror" is the most brilliantly convenient excuse for US international (and national, I take it) action ever created.

alfonso · Apr 1, 2003

Quote from buzzy2:

YES, the intention is enough....

Do you lie to yourself like this in all aspects of life Buzz?

I never spoke about the intention (which remains unproven), I was asking about the capability.

Ninja · Apr 1, 2003

Quote from buzzy2:

...

and for the idiot Ninja:

9/11 is relevant because since 9/11 America will no longer wait to see the body bags with Americans before striking its enemies.

I see - now you are strinking the 'enemies' first and then the body bags are coming home in consequence of that. No big improvement. I wouldn't vote for W.B. again - he makes a bad job.

buzzy2 · Apr 1, 2003

Quote from alfonso:

I never spoke about the intention (which remains unproven), I was asking about the capability.

How would a brainwashed liberal prove intention? Only after people is killed.

France, Germany, England have greater destructive capability than Iraq but it is Saddam the one that constitute a threat to Americans.

buzzy2 · Apr 1, 2003

Quote from Ninja:

So now you are strinking the 'enemies' first and then the body bags are coming home in consequence of that? I wouldn't vote for W.B. again - he makes a bad job.

Ninja: does your kindergarten logic distinguish between military losses and 3000 civilians killed in the heart of NYC?

Ninja · Apr 1, 2003

Quote from buzzy2:

Ninja: does your kindergarten logic distinguish between military losses and 3000 civilians killed in the heart of NYC?

So you think that a soldier has no mom, dad, sister, brother, daughter, son, etc. who will miss him, when he dies in this war for oil? And in addition you will have a lot more killed civilians in american cities, because arab people don't like it when their cities are bombed and they fight the war with their own weapons...

buzzy2 · Apr 1, 2003

Quote from Ninja:

So now you are strinking the 'enemies' first and then the body bags are coming home in consequence of that? I wouldn't vote for W.B. again - he makes a bad job.

Do you really vote? Are you really in the US? Your bad english betrays you.

alfonso · Apr 1, 2003

Quote from buzzy2:

How would a brainwashed liberal prove intention? Only after people is killed.

France, Germany, England have greater destructive capability than Iraq but it is Saddam the one that constitute a threat to Americans.

But what is that assumption based on?

The attempt on the snr Bush's life? Is that all you have?

I'll ask you again, where are these links to terrorism -- and Al-Q in particular -- your government keeps reassuring the world that it knows about?

If SH does have WMD, then he's had them for years -- why hasn't there been even one instance where he has armed these terrorists to attack his "sworn enemy", the US?