Quote from wrbtrader:
ALL data has become the past as soon as you see it. As soon as you see it as data...it is already past data.
Thus, you suggesting one can do or should only do analysis on data that has yet become into existence. If so, I'm very curious how we (I) can do such (serious question) ?
Maybe this gets into your inability or refusal to define or give a hypothetical example of a before the fact signal call. I'm now more curious about your commentaries because I think there's a connection with your recent commentaries (e.g. before the fact) and your now above quote that implies doing analysis on data that is not yet in existence as something that can provide an edge in the market.![]()
P.S. I do understand you're making a distinction between "other data" versus "past price". Without your example of "other data", I will just consider it a smoke screen on your part in your effort to continue arguing and trolling.
P.S.S. ET has a section called "Data Sets and Feeds" @ http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/forumdisplay.php?s=&forumid=66
Surf doesn't believe in the present. I wonder if there's a pill for that.Quote from vinc:
so no such thing as the current bid & ask ? we all trade past prices? it's a bit like saying there is no future it's only past and that would exclude us all from the now![]()

Quote from marketsurfer:
You are completely missing the point
Allow me to explain. Price is the past as it has already formed, otherwise it can't exist. Therefore the building block of TA--price--is past data. Data that exists prior to price being formed is not past data for purposes of this definition. Data such as the book, price drivers, intramarket realationships , money flows, etc. is all data that happens before price is formed therefore, if analysised correctly provides an edge asto what price may do in the future. Past price cannot provide an objectiv edge as it has occurred and price is what you trade. This is not semantics nor illogical. Surf
Quote from marketsurfer:
You are completely missing the point
Allow me to explain. Price is the past as it has already formed, otherwise it can't exist. Therefore the building block of TA--price--is past data. Data that exists prior to price being formed is not past data for purposes of this definition. Data such as the book, price drivers, intramarket realationships , money flows, etc. is all data that happens before price is formed therefore, if analysised correctly provides an edge asto what price may do in the future. Past price cannot provide an objectiv edge as it has occurred and price is what you trade. This is not semantics nor illogical. Surf
Quote from wrbtrader:
I understand what you're saying but you are wrong about a key point.
Price = Past Data (everybody knows that as noted earlier)
Data sets BEFORE price is still Past Data and to say its not is illogical.
For example, as soon as someone sees money flow, intramarket relationships...that's info that has happen = Past Data and if it continues happening is an entirely different story.
Therefore, don't misunderstand, I'm not debating if Price or Other Data sets helps with one's edge. I'm debating the fact that you're trying to label information that occurs BEFORE price as NOT past data...that's an incorrect labeling nor is this an issue of semantics.
Reminder - Please provide an example of a "before the fact" call so that those you're pointing a finger at can know exactly what you're talking about.
Quote from euclid:
You are forgetting something.
Allow me to explain. Data such as the book, price drivers, intramarket relationships , money flows, etc. is the past as it has already formed, otherwise it can't exist. Data such as price is data that happens before the book, price drivers, intramarket relationships , money flows, etc. is formed therefore, if analysed correctly provides an edge as to what the book, price drivers, intramarket realationships , money flows, etc. may do in the future. This is not semantics nor illogical.
Quote from marketsurfer:
...Context is everything. surf