What is Logical?

MandelbrotSet · Mar 1, 2009

I see FrothLogic the liar and coward is going off on yet another one of his tantrums, LOL.

Like I said, a professional doesn't spend all of their time, day and night posting on ET.

Frothy here is the one selling trading systems and expensive books because he can't make it as a trader on his own, I'm not.

Wait for it ... zing! :0)

Equalizer · Mar 1, 2009

Quote from ProfLogic:

Intelligent people do . . . the Swiss think tank nominates individuals due to their experience with the financial community and their association to the University of Zurich.

I'll humour you poor lad.

Still no proof of:

a). Who this Swiss "Think Tank" is. Oh yeah, I forgot, you want my name and snail mail address for that. For some reason scan/email won't cut it. Nice try but no donut.

b). The fact that they have nominated you.

And once again for that hard of thinking. Even if the above was true, which we shall assume it is not until proven, why say 2006 Nobel Committee instead of Swiss think tank?

Nobel sounds so much better doesn't it Frothy?

ProfLogic · Mar 1, 2009

Quote from MandelbrotSet:

I see FrothLogic the liar and coward is going off on yet another one of his tantrums, LOL.
Like I said, a professional doesn't spend all of their time, day and night posting on ET.
Frothy here is the one selling trading systems and expensive books because he can't make it as a trader on his own, I'm not.
Wait for it ... zing! :0)

Just having a battle of wits with an unarmed person . . . as usual.

Oh, I'm not the coward negro . . . I'm always available.

Asian markets are open . . . of course you wouldn't know about things like that. I'm running my Swing trades for the week.

ProfLogic · Mar 1, 2009

Quote from Equalizer:

I'll humour you poor lad.

Still no proof of:

a). Who this Swiss "Think Tank" is. Oh yeah, I forgot, you want my name and snail mail address for that. For some reason scan/email won't cut it. Nice try but no donut.

b). The fact that they have nominated you.

And once again for that hard of thinking. Even if the above was true, which we shall assume it is not until proven, why say 2006 Nobel Committee instead of Swiss think tank? Nobel sounds so much better doesn't it Frothy?

a). Coward . . .

b). The think tank sends in the nonimations to the committee. You still have no clue how the process works do you?

Equalizer · Mar 1, 2009

Quote from ProfLogic:

a). Coward . . .

b). The think tank sends in the nonimations to the committee. You still have no clue how the process works do you?

a). No. You are the coward, for if you had the balls instead of shallots you'd post some verification regarding your delusional statements. Just protecting myself from psychopaths like yourself. No one on ET should give you or anyone else their real name and contact details. So we are then to assume that you are a LIAR as you do not want to scan/email said document (a figment of your imagination).

b). Who gives a fuck what this mythical "Think Tank" does. You keep on avoiding answering the second question asked (like the first) - perhaps English isn't your native tongue, or you are just dimwitted, or both. Your answer has nothing to do with the original question which asked why your statement in that post said "2006 Nobel Committee", and not some "Swiss Think Tank". I think we all know the answer. It is because you are a PATHOLOGICAL LIAR.

ProfLogic · Mar 1, 2009

Quote from Equalizer:

a). No. You are the coward, for if you had the balls instead of shallots you'd post some verification regarding your delusional statements. Just protecting myself from psychopaths like yourself. No one on ET should give you or anyone else their real name and contact details. So we are then to assume that you are a LIAR as you do not want to scan/email said document (a figment of your imagination).

b). Who gives a fuck what this mythical "Think Tank" does. You keep on avoiding answering the second question asked (like the first) - perhaps English isn't your native tongue, or you are just dimwitted, or both. Your answer has nothing to do with the original question which asked why your statement in that post said "2006 Nobel Committee", and not some "Swiss Think Tank". I think we all know the answer. It is because you are a PATHOLOGICAL LIAR.

Yawn . . . .

Post anything so you can say the documents were photoshopped like the last time? You are ignorant. I do not have to prove anything when you and your worthless group of misfits don't have the brains collectively to test what I do on your own anyway.

Hell, you can even remember what YOU posted from a few hours ago. I stated I was nominated by a Nobel committee, read what YOU posted idiot. I NEVER said I was nominated by the "2006 Nobel Committee". You lie so much you can't keep your own lies in your own posts straight. You figure you stretch things enough someone might believe it.

Amazing, you must to be a Jimmy clone or at least aspire to be one.

Equalizer · Mar 1, 2009

Quote from ProfLogic:

Yawn . . . .

Post anything so you can say the documents were photoshopped like the last time? You are ignorant. I do not have to prove anything when you and your worthless group of misfits don't have the brains collectively to test what I do on your own anyway.

Hell, you can even remember what YOU posted from a few hours ago. I stated I was nominated by a Nobel committee, read what YOU posted idiot. I NEVER said I was nominated by the "2006 Nobel Committee". You lie so much you can't keep your own lies in your own posts straight. You figure you stretch things enough someone might believe it.

Amazing, you must to be a Jimmy clone or at least aspire to be one.

Every time you open your trap you dribble with shit. You should change your handle to Boron_the_Moron.

a). Show me where I have ever accused you of photoshopping anything you lying twat? Oh, I see, another diversionary attempt by making up crap like you usually do. You must have pulled that "fact" out of your arsehole like you usually do. BTW, I am still waiting for that scanned document of the "Think Tank's" recommendation.

b). You like your selective quotes. You posted "I was nominated by a Nobel committee in Switzerland in 2006". That is not the same as a "Swiss Think Tank" you liar arsewipe.

and in case people need a reminder, here is the rather comical thread in its entirety:

http://forum.tssupport.com/viewtopi...t=&sid=e320c742cd29b90c63bad883f95af398#22639

You are a typicall scammer lying arsehole. You make grandiose statements to impress noobs who you wish to fleece with your bullshit courses, but when asked to verify those grandiose statements you always try to weasel out by:

a). Not asnwering the question.
b). Answering the question with a question.
c). Attacking the person asking the question. This is how you did it in your old PalTalk room, where your "disciples" were too afraid to ask questions.
d). Basically you dance around words, never answering what was asked, posting nonsense (as per usual). Like now, you are trying to weasel out of a corner with all sorts of nonsense.

- FACT: You posted "I was nominated by a Nobel committee in Switzerland in 2006". (In link given above).

- FACT: You are now trying to change your story to "Swiss Think Tank". Thus, regardless of whether this point is true or not, your Nobel 2006 statement is false, and thus that post is a lie.

- FACT: You are reticent to provide any details even about said "Think Tank" (LOL).

Draw your own conclusions folks. FrothLogic is one of ET's more slimey in-duh-viduals after your noob dollars. Oh yeah, but the mofo reckons he can trade with his "perfect method" and 100% trades, he is just doing it 'cause he is a nice guy "ya know". The $3.9K is just to cover costs ROFLMAO.

Hey Frothy, your pants are on fire...

MandelbrotSet · Mar 2, 2009

Quote from Equalizer:

Every time you open your trap you dribble with shit. You should change your handle to Boron_the_Moron.

a). Show me where I have ever accused you of photoshopping anything you lying twat? Oh, I see, another diversionary attempt by making up crap like you usually do. You must have pulled that "fact" out of your arsehole like you usually do. BTW, I am still waiting for that scanned document of the "Think Tank's" recommendation.

b). You like your selective quotes. You posted "I was nominated by a Nobel committee in Switzerland in 2006". That is not the same as a "Swiss Think Tank" you liar arsewipe.

and in case people need a reminder, here is the rather comical thread in its entirety:

http://forum.tssupport.com/viewtopi...t=&sid=e320c742cd29b90c63bad883f95af398#22639

You are a typicall scammer lying arsehole. You make grandiose statements to impress noobs who you wish to fleece with your bullshit courses, but when asked to verify those grandiose statements you always try to weasel out by:

a). Not asnwering the question.
b). Answering the question with a question.
c). Attacking the person asking the question. This is how you did it in your old PalTalk room, where your "disciples" were too afraid to ask questions.
d). Basically you dance around words, never answering what was asked, posting nonsense (as per usual). Like now, you are trying to weasel out of a corner with all sorts of nonsense.

- FACT: You posted "I was nominated by a Nobel committee in Switzerland in 2006". (In link given above).

- FACT: You are now trying to change your story to "Swiss Think Tank". Thus, regardless of whether this point is true or not, your Nobel 2006 statement is false, and thus that post is a lie.

- FACT: You are reticent to provide any details even about said "Think Tank" (LOL).

Draw your own conclusions folks. FrothLogic is one of ET's more slimey in-duh-viduals after your noob dollars. Oh yeah, but the mofo reckons he can trade with his "perfect method" and 100% trades, he is just doing it 'cause he is a nice guy "ya know". The $3.9K is just to cover costs ROFLMAO.

Hey Frothy, your pants are on fire...

Yeah, ForthLogic lies through his teeth without hesitation or remorse.

I have a sneaky suspicion that what you've itemized there is just the tipe of the iceberg, and there's a ton more where that came from.

Look on the bright side, we aren't the ones drinking his Kool-Aid!

Equalizer · Mar 2, 2009

Quote from MandelbrotSet:

Yeah, ForthLogic lies through his teeth without hesitation or remorse.

I have a sneaky suspicion that what you've itemized there is just the tipe of the iceberg, and there's a ton more where that came from.

Look on the bright side, we aren't the ones drinking his Kool-Aid!

Agreed. You know, "A Leopard doesn't change its spots", and "Where there's smoke there's fire" and all that sheah makes perfect sense with Frothy. Thing is he can't help himself. It is natural for a sociopath to spin BS like there no tomorrow. Kinda appropriate that his initials are BS...

ubertuber · Apr 26, 2009

This is odd. I did not begin this thread nor come up with it's cheesy title but it would appear that I did. My posts were parsed from another thread begun by El Guapo entitled "ProfLogic's Method" and are now presented here and out of context.

I was not aware this thread existed nor wish to be associated with it.

As the pseudo OP whom was not informed of the creation of this thread, nor see the significance of same, would kindly request the Moderator whom begun this thread to now close it.

thanks for understanding,
UT