What is Logical?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yes MandelbrotSet, funny thing is some of those guys are not complete noobs, yet their lack of "logic" leaves one speechless. BTW, I just saw your post in "that" thread. I wonder how long before his "disciple" removes it.
 
Quote from Equalizer:

LOL... this is from a while back (from his arsechum's site) but still funny

http://forum.tssupport.com/viewtopi...t=&sid=e320c742cd29b90c63bad883f95af398#22639

As we have already said, Bill Schamp is incompetent. Let me explain why.

Bill Schamp absolutely seriously claims that he once almost became a Nobel Prize winner. He also proclaimed himself a professor of logic and a software developer. All at the same time.
Obviously, this can’t be true, but Bill has his own peculiar perception of reality. Therefore, he cannot objectively assess the situation and our arguments don’t mean anything to him. Apart from that, Bill misrepresents facts as is typical of him.


:p:D:p

and then Frothy's unvelievable response to MC support's scathing reply:

"I was nominated by a Nobel committee in Switzerland in 2006 for my research in price movement as it realated to price bars and volume. That isn't the same as winning a Nobel but I wouldn't expect you to understand the difference. I taught logic and problem solving at a corporate level to programmers inside developmental environments. I worked on numerious [sic] software developmental (LOL, developmental :D) teams over the last 30 years as well. I can document my experience and my achievements. I'm sorry you feel the necessity to belittle my accomplishments just to justify your position."

ROFLMAO. Can you prove that Bill? Or is this fake like your "doctorial" [sic] thesis, as expected from a pathological liar. :D

The statment was by a 20 something English/Russian interpreter that works for MultiCharts. Her status as a talking head "only" can be verified by anyone that attended the Las Vegas Trader's Expo and asked her a technical question. She, Marina, has zero technical experience. I also have the apology from the company owner I was sent as well.

I presented my research to a Swiss think tank in 2006 for which I received my nomination. Posting my acceptance letter would be met with the typical "Photoshop" comments that have been posted in the past.

I need prove nothing to those that can not verify anything on their own.
 
Quote from Sushi:

First price action and price bars would never be something the noble committee would have interest in. Bill schamp also claimed that he was getting a patent on his system. This is pure bullshit. Patent office would never grant such nonsense. Someone hear called him on this lie and he shrunk back into the shadows. It's all here someplace on elite

Remember find one lie and amedt of them lurk nearby. Rear metal 2007
Of course the Nobel committe would never get involved with such nonsense. This is what makes it so comical. :D I love ET.
 
Quote from MandelbrotSet:

OMFG!

This post is priceless (you'd seriously had better back it up now!).

It goes beyond the fact that both Equalizer and I know that ProfLogic is frabricator of stories (to the poing of outright lieing) or that he is pompous and arrogant and will say and do anything to protect his internet persona (LOL).

The man is verging on meglomania and psychosis! :0)
***
Nobel Prizes, leading Corporate Software Development Teams and teaching a Perfect Trading System .... OH MY!

My history is verifiable . . . are you ready to come out of the closet to validate it?
 
Quote from Equalizer:

Yes MandelbrotSet, funny thing is some of those guys are not complete noobs, yet their lack of "logic" leaves one speechless. BTW, I just saw your post in "that" thread. I wonder how long before his "disciple" removes it.
Hell, I'm posting it all over the place where FrothLogic usually hangs-out. I want to make sure these people know what they are dealing with.

The desperate noobs (at least one of them doesn't have a job, has no other source of income, and needs to "make it work" to survive) will follow him off the cliff.

But anyone else with one-half of a brain will see what a complete con job he is and steer clear of him.
 
Quote from ProfLogic:

My history is verifiable . . . are you ready to come out of the closet to validate it?
Post your Nobel Nominee for all of us to see!

Go ahead Billy Boy, we're waiting for ya. :0)

P.S. I seriously think they need to up you medication levels.
 
Quote from ProfLogic:

The statment was by a 20 something English/Russian interpreter that works for MultiCharts. Her status as a talking head "only" can be verified by anyone that attended the Las Vegas Trader's Expo and asked her a technical question. She, Marina, has zero technical experience. I also have the apology from the company owner I was sent as well.

I presented my research to a Swiss think tank in 2006 for which I received my nomination. Posting my acceptance letter would be met with the typical "Photoshop" comments that have been posted in the past.

I need prove nothing to those that can not verify anything on their own.
Swiss Think Tank (Thick Tank? :D) is NOT THE NOBEL COMMITTEE.

So:

a). What did this THINK TANK (NOT NOBEL COMMITTEE) nominate you for? I bet it wasn't the 2006 Nobel Prize which you seem to imply in your post on that forum.

b). Can you prove it? A contact of this THINK TANK should suffice.

c). If you don't wish to prove anything, then refrain from making such grandiose statements, whose only function is to impress gullible noobs ready for fleecing. Otherwise prove what you claim.
 
Quote from Sushi:

First price action and price bars would never be something the noble committee would have interest in. Bill schamp also claimed that he was getting a patent on his system. This is pure bullshit. Patent office would never grant such nonsense. Someone hear called him on this lie and he shrunk back into the shadows. It's all here someplace on elite

Remember find one lie and amedt of them lurk nearby. Rear metal 2007

I have the initial patent number . . .
The paper was regarding physics and the economy . . . two things alien to you.

I will repeat the same comment to you fish breath . . . I can verify my history. Care you come out of the closet to validate it?
 
Quote from MandelbrotSet:

Hell, I'm posting it all over the place where FrothLogic usually hangs-out. I want to make sure these people know what they are dealing with.

The desperate noobs (at least one of them doesn't have a job, has no other source of income, and needs to "make it work" to survive) will follow him off the cliff.

But anyone else with one-half of a brain will see what a complete con job he is and steer clear of him.

The angry negro speaks . . .
 
Quote from Equalizer:

Swiss Think Tank (Thick Tank? :D) is NOT THE NOBEL COMMITTEE. So:
a). What did this THINK TANK (NOT NOBEL COMMIITTEE) nominate you for? I bet it wasn't the 2006 Nobel Prize which you seemed to imply in your post on that forum.
b). Can you prove it? A contact of this THINK TANK should suffice.
ProfLogic makes up stories left-and-right about who he wants to be in his fantasy life.

He also claimed that a friend of his created range bars (ROTFLMAO)!
***
The thing is, with all of these so-called accomplishments, he's constantly trolling ET night and day.

LOL, it just doesn't get much better than this!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top