What is Logical?

[MandelbrotSet]

OK, I've archived the thread, because after no less than seven negative reviews and one positive review, I think it might go the way of the Dodo bird pretty soon.

You the good reader, experienced trader, or simple noob, can draw your own conclusion(s).

I didn't make anything up here, just did the necessary due diligence, did a little investigatory work and used a search engine. The posts are all there, and considering the extraordinary lack of positive evidence to the contrary, I can only draw my own conclusions on the true viability of ProfLogic's Trading System.

Being an intelligent and free thinking individual, you should feel free to do the same.

Ciao!

 

[MandelbrotSet]

Quote from Tums:

LOL... without taking sides (Hershey or AHG or ProfLogic or SPM or whoever),
you should also do a search with the keywords "Proflogic" and "thanks".

Yes, Tums.

We all know you never take sides in any of these discussions/arguments where Gurus who dispense their free information is concerned.

 

[ProfLogic]

Quote from MandelbrotSet:

That simply is not true at all, you're just saying that to get sympathy from the Moderators (Prof always tries to play the sympathy card when all else fails).

That is the truth and if you say you have tested my method you are a bold faced liar.

 

[Tums]

Quote from MandelbrotSet:
OK, I've archived the thread, because after no less than seven negative reviews and one positive review, I think it might go the way of the Dodo bird pretty soon...
Ciao!

I have yet to see a piece of empirical evidence. (if you know what that means.)
All you have are hearsay.
But, at least you are not writing poems.
That's a big improvement.

 

[MandelbrotSet]

Quote from ProfLogic:

That is the truth and if you say you have tested my method you are a bold faced liar.

LOL

Why should I (or anyone else) test your method when NO ONE can come forth and show their blotters and trading statements (thus providing solid, verifiable proof) when I already have a system where traders have?

That isn't very logical, you know. :eek:

 

[MandelbrotSet]

Quote from Tums:

I have yet to see a piece of empirical evidence. (if you know what that means.)

Awww, is that more of your impersonal Moderator showing through?

Quote from Tums:

All you have are hearsay.

Using that argument, everything posted on this website without solid evidence (ie, blotters and statements) is hearsay ... yep, sounds about right.

Quote from Tums:

^

Note: Please keep posts on topic, otherwise I will have to submit a complaint to the Moderator ... LMAO.

P.S. Seen any good Trojan Horses around here Tums, ROTFLMAO!

 

[Tums]

Quote from MandelbrotSet:
Yes, Tums.
We all know you never take sides in any of these discussions/arguments where Gurus who dispense their free information is concerned.

I don't care if his name is ProfLogic or Profnonsense.
He is presenting a method here.
People are asking questions and getting answers.
If you have a question, you can challenge him too.

But if you disrupt a discussion because you think the method is confusing, obscure and and oftimes inscrutable, then you get kicked. It is that simple. There is no need for me to take sides.

You claimed this method is confusing, obscure and and oftimes inscrutable.
So far you have talked a lot, quoted some hearsay, but have yet to demonstrate how is the method confusing, obscure and and oftimes inscrutable. (BTW, the trading rules are on page 10.)


p.s. You do present yourself as confused, obscure, and oftimes inscrutable.

 

[MandelbrotSet]

Quote from Tums:

Blah Blah Blah

I posted no less than 7 Reviews of ProfLogic's System, which is what the OP requested.

My posts are right on-topic and of value to the thread, your posts are just more of your trollish interference in the conversation of other posters (while pretending to be a disinterested Moderator) and ProfLogic's posts were all over the map (always avoiding the topic of providing the proof that the OP requested, of course).

LMAO - Tums the Troll strikes again!

 

[ProfLogic]

Quote from MandelbrotSet:

That isn't very logical, you know. :eek:

You determining what is logical is like George W. Bush determining what makes up the parts of a sentence.

 

[MandelbrotSet]

And another:

PROFLOGIC REVIEW #8

"jr222 ...Two years ago i attended one of proflogic's private seminars. The fee was 7500$ for 5 days. What he is teaching is not wrong but it is very basic stuff. It was definitely not worth the money. He told me the trades on his website were real but i never saw him trading real-time. When i asked who was placing the orders while he was traveling he said: "My wife". The disclaimer on the results page ("All trade set-ups ... are based in theory") was added only months later - after the CFTC contacted him. "

Real ProfLogic Review #8