What in the hell is driving liberals to the point of insanity?

"... What in the hell is driving liberals to the point of insanity?..."

Same thing that always drives them.... insatiable greed and power lust.

 
"That's not me."
- John Miller Donald Trump
see, it's a joke, John Miller is a character Trump plays who really likes Trump. We think it's funny. Trump owes no pledge to tell the truth to the media. Everybody that is going to vote for him already knows it was him and the media is stupid.

But keep trying
 
see, it's a joke, John Miller is a character Trump plays who really likes Trump. We think it's funny. Trump owes no pledge to tell the truth to the media. Everybody that is going to vote for him already knows it was him and the media is stupid.

But keep trying
So why does he deny it?
 
So why does he deny it?
I don't think he wants to be known as a radio voice actor. Unless you can prove it I would deny it also. If he admits it the media won. Or at least if he answers a question the way they ask it, all set up. He may admit it, but when the time and setting are more favorable, and then only if it becomes a big deal because small minded people are posting on the internet because they think candidates should be more presidential when they lie.

see, it's a skit, a prank he use to play, using different names, everybody knew it was him at the time. The DJ liked it and it was fun. Sort of like a ventriloquist is not responsible for what his dummy says. And never admit it is you doing the voice. As long as he denies it, John Miller is alive and well.
 
Last edited:
I don't think he wants to be known as a radio voice actor. Unless you can prove it I would deny it also. If he admits it the media won. Or at least if he answers a question the way they ask it, all set up. He may admit it, but when the time and setting are more favorable, and then only if it becomes a big deal because small minded people are posting on the internet because they think candidates sould be more presidential when they lie.
That's a pathetic rationalization, but I give you credit for calling his denial what it is: a lie.
 
I edited and added on. I thought it was pretty good
The right is fucking themselves with this. If it's ok for Drumpf to lie, for whatever reason, it's ok for Hillary to lie and it has been ok for Obama to lie. Cease the criticisms along this line of Hillary, and take back the seven years of this criticism of Obama for it, too, then.

Priebus has said that we shouldn't judge Drumpf by the things he's said and done in the past, that as Christians we shouldn't be judgemental, shouldn't throw stones in a glass house. How does that excuse for Drumpf help you guys, exactly? Priebus or someone like him also said we should "let the office shape the man". Then let the office shape the woman, what's the difference, another elaborate excuse?
 
Back
Top