Quote from bigarrow:
James your example is nothing like the Zimmerman case. From what you wrote the boys were breaking into cars. Trayvon was not committing any crime. Geezus H Christ, you guys.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I think is really so simple like you say. HOW DO PEOPLE COMPARE THIS TWO?
One man hear something, then he go look, and SEE crime on the (private) property. He is one man and he see (3) boys. He show his gun, he tell them he call the 911.
Quote from James link.
"In 2009, a man was asleep on his couch when he heard noises outside. He grabbed his gun, told his girlfriend to call 911, then went outside. Once there, he confronted three youths who were attempting to break into a neighborâs vehicle.
His desire was to merely detain the three. He specifically stated it was not his intent to shoot anyone. As he approached the three, he could see that the dome light of the vehicle was on and at least one person was inside rummaging around."
Read more:
http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/07/w...-roderick-scott-have-in-common/#ixzz2a1Ag1633
Trayvon was walking home. George never see crime. George only imagine Trayvon is suspicious. Trayvon IS NOT on the private
property, and he is going home. Trayvon is legal to be where he is. The boys in James link are not legal to be in the car they do not own. George NEVER tell Trayvon he is neighborhood watch.