in the same silly fashion; using your tautology as an example...
If the "god particle" does need a creator, then there's simply no need for an atheist.
If a creator doesn't need a creator, it's just another description for no need of an atheist without even establishing the need for an atheist in the first place.
If the "god particle" does need a creator, then there's simply no need for an atheist.
If a creator doesn't need a creator, it's just another description for no need of an atheist without even establishing the need for an atheist in the first place.
Quote from stu:
If the "god particle" doesn't need a creator, then there's simply no need for a creator.
If a creator doesn't need a creator, it's just another description for no need of a creator, without even establishing the need for one in the first place.