What if 9/11 had terrorist dropping Nukes instead of crashing planes?

ZZZzzzzzzz · Jan 2, 2009

How would we have responded differently if it had been a nuclear attack, rather than a lucky break against us that airport security and the FBI were asleep at the switch?

ZZZzzzzzzz · Jan 2, 2009

If Bin Laden had ordered a nuclear strike, a successful one, would we have found him by now?

a_person · Jan 2, 2009

We'd turn the country that supplied the nukes into a desert. Duh, what a no-brainer.

nutmeg · Jan 2, 2009

This is a confusing question. The attack on the twin towers came from within the country rather than originating from another country.

If there was a nuclear attack from within the country, the response should be the same. Looking for the country of origin that precipitated the attacks.

If a nuclear attack originated from outside the country, there would be a different response.

ZZZzzzzzzz · Jan 2, 2009

Really?

If an attack came from terrorist within the country, who had nukes, that caused the death of perhaps hundreds of thousands and much more physical damage...the response would have been the same?

Bin Laden would still be free?

Quote from nutmeg:

This is a confusing question. The attack on the twin towers came from within the country rather than originating from another country.

If there was a nuclear attack from within the country, the response should be the same. Looking for the country of origin that precipitated the attacks.

If a nuclear attack originated from outside the country, there would be a different response.

bxptone · Jan 2, 2009

Quote from nutmeg:

This is a confusing question. The attack on the twin towers came from within the country rather than originating from another country.

If there was a nuclear attack from within the country, the response should be the same. Looking for the country of origin that precipitated the attacks.

If a nuclear attack originated from outside the country, there would be a different response.

Whats even MORE CONFUSING, is how the attackers were SAUDI ARABIANS, but we attacked IRAQ and AFGHANASTAN, NOT Saudi Arabia.

What's even THAT MUCH MORE CONFUSING, is how AFTER we were attacked this is what we see....

http://www.hermes-press.com/bush_kiss.jpg
http://www.texemarrs.com/images/bush_kisses_gannon.jpg
http://wwwimage.cbsnews.com/images/2008/01/11/image3699739g.jpg
http://trafael.tripod.com/kissing_bush.jpg
http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/photos/uncategorized/bush_hand_holding.jpg

forextrades · Jan 2, 2009

Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:

What if 9/11 had terrorist dropping Nukes instead of crashing planes?

Then you can be damn sure that the US government was involved in it in some way.

Terrorist groups don't just buy/develop nukes without the CIA knowing about it.

talknet · Jan 3, 2009

Quote from bxptone:

Whats even MORE CONFUSING, is how the attackers were SAUDI ARABIANS, but we attacked IRAQ and AFGHANASTAN, NOT Saudi Arabia.

Majority of terrorists fighting in Iraq are from Saudi Arabia. I agree with "bxptone", USA should now attack Saudi Arabia.

Mercor · Jan 3, 2009

Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:

How would we have responded differently if it had been a nuclear attack.

We know that you would be blaming the Americans and the Jewish scientists because they invented the Bomb.

twofacedjoker · Jan 3, 2009

Looking back is more painful than looking forward.