learning that impulse moves and correction moves were the building blocks of market structure and learning how to recognise each
The basic grandularity of market structure are points and durations in between those points. These points identify extremes. Points not on an extreme are within a duration from the extremes.
The market structure is fractal in nature. Fractals are loosely coupled to timescales. These points manifest in the fastest fractal as a price bar and an accompanying volume bar on any timescale. All bars have OHLCV as points.
When they are monitored in-parallel, real-time and combined with a second price bar and associated volume, it creates a pairing of price bars, otherwise know as a price case.
Price cases encapsulates all possible price moves between two bars. It’s the alphabet by which to learn the language of the market on a granular level. Price migrates and moves through a sequence of events if one expands their orientation of price movement from vertical to horizontal orientation.
By building one’s facility of using a horizontal orientation to annotate one’s chart with tapes, tapes that build traverses, traverses that build channels then one has the foundation by which to ‘see’ the market.
What you are describing ‘impulse and corrective moves’ are subjective interpretations based on (as you apply them) an arbitrarily changing rule set. This in and of itself is normal, however your charts contain only half of available market data in a market where accurate volume information is not available.
Not only is it like trying to take a road trip with no way of monitoring gas usage, it’s also like attempting to swing at a pitched fast ball with one eye. You see the ball, but have no way to understand the depth of field, acceleration, de acceleration, velocity, dwell, etc., nor make use of any of it.
Imho, any insight of the above requires rigorous study of market structure and dynamics accomplished through personal Due Diligence through deduction and ‘thinking’.
There are 32 types of traders whom have their needs met by the market (taxonomy by L.Harris).
The most common is the classification of ‘futile traders’. This classification identifies traders whom the very act of trading is a losing activity and endeavor. This group of traders are more attached to their pre-existing beliefs and inaccurate perceptions than doing the necessary work to transform them.
The needs being met of a futile trader is primarily based in experiencing negative emotions.