My win rate and profit ratio say otherwise.. But I have noticed, for example, I have issues after great winning streaks (like most traders I guess...). This is psychological and hard to monitor/correct on one's (my?) own.. For example, after I reach +100% returns over a period of time <1year (with minimum drawdowns per trade), I noticed I go on tilt. Why 100%? Am I unique? Certainly not regarding to performance after big winning streaks (maybe regarding the 100% mark). Has a coach been faced with many such cases? Yes. Will he know better than I what to do and let me avoid giving back a large part of those gains? Probably. Van Tharp charges 20k$ per consultation... (not in my price range yet...) But I doubt he could charge that if he did nt add any value, even considering he has a lot of HF clients with money to burn... I have already said to myself to stop trading after such streaks, but finally I don t do it... Maybe it will be like with other many adjustments in trading, after I get hit hard a couple of times, I will change my behavior. Would not mind to pay for a shortcut in this case tho...
I am emotional trader cause of way I grew up in a non traditional environment. When I was first groping along trying to figure out why commodities don't trade same as stock longer term and why day trading was so hard. Not all that many books in mid 80s, many willing to teach, didn't take long to figure out those who taught didn't trade or much. Then I went higher to those who were actually in the pits, bad mistake cause Pit trading not like screen trading, so I turned to market psychologists, even at some point took Van Tharp's home study book and few hour sessions with him, I came away from all of it this way- I simple either too dumb or too smart to believe in psycho babbling from people who don't trade, unless you in the trenches each day feeling the intensity of what we do on everyday job, you can't tell me how I should breath or think. I finally at some point learned how to program, kept two journals and tape recorder, someone else would transcribe whatever I would say on recordings. The emotional journals were more important as time went by as I was very good at being wrong at best/worst times of a trade. I eventually figured out this "Price bars are usually opposite of how we feel", when market is zooming one way hard and fast, NOW this tells me we be going other way pretty quick, take profits and reverse.
BUT BUT BUT it got tested first, every possible problem I could dream up through the years, I have. So like problem with the Greeks came up, I knew from financial history from would unfold, markets would spike on open, wait several minutes and go other way, don't trade heavy, don't have to be a pig.
Your question of when drawdown comes after so much gain, you do enough testing, you can see and figure out at some percentage of new equity highs, either lighten the load or add options to hedge.
You know why Van Tharp gets 20k? Cause people will pay it, too many people gullible thinking that will cure their bad methods. Too many traders put on way too many trades and trade all day, Design method like you would automate it, you have to have an answer before a problem.