The real question is whom in politics is willing to not further compound the current problem ?
The choice is simple, either face a big problem now, or a much bigger one later.
So which is more prudent ?
Do poltical influences really have the framework to construct a decision ?
The issue needs to be explained in the simplest terms possible.
The real blanket question relates to the worldwide issue of available credit in that $2 Trillion is more than $60 Trillion in loans at 30x....
If $100 billion tax relief infusions are currently considered to be helpful......
Then why not be more helpful and resolve $ multi trillion issues ?