Sub $6. LOL
Quote from jackpearson:
Wow! Check this out!!!
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/credit-suisse-plans-reopen-issuance-232400592.html
Another chapter of the story. Did someone know that was coming??? It's awfully coincidental that the thing tanked & then that PR comes out after the close.
Did the fall cause the issuer to come out with that PR? OR, did someone know that PR was coming & got out before all the premium in the TVIX was let out of it.
It sure seems fishy.
They should track the trades from when it first started falling.
Quote from lwlee:
The underlying index is TVIXIV. Anyone trading this thing should have kept a very close watch on that index. If you didn't you weren't paying enough attention, especially for such a dangerous leveraged product. The divergence was very apparent before the thing imploded.
I have a friend who's too stubborn to get out even tho he's in at around 16. We always have arguments about stop-loss and risk management. It's unfortunate it had to get to this.
Quote from lwlee:
The underlying index is TVIXIV. Anyone trading this thing should have kept a very close watch on that index.
Quote from ScalperJoe:
Here's an article providing some examples when the ETN is trading well above its net asset value:
http://seekingalpha.com/article/469631-etf-investors-beware-the-coming-etn-backlash?source=yahoo
Quote from johnnyqpublic:
Actually didn't notice any examples wrt net asset value in the article. Perhaps a different article?
Quote from ScalperJoe:
No, it's from the same article, regarding the disconnect between the share price and the net asset value of two ETNs, the TVIX and GAZ:
"That is because both were - or still are - trading at significant premiums to their NAV. This means that the assets in each unit of the note are worth less than what they are trading for on the open market. Generally speaking, this is a result of the ETN issuers refusing to put out more shares on the open market which can create a disconnect between underlying prices and the share price of the note."