We're veering off subject here, Misthos, I believe... We've discussed this issue before. Yes, I am in agreement with you, TBTF is bad and has to be dealt with. Yes, people have not been punished sufficiently for the irresponsible crap they have done. But what else is new?Quote from Misthos:
Indiscriminate and irresponsible lending has not fully been punished, IMHO. And what is the result? TBTF institutions that are still calling the shots, setting up the entire system for a more catastrophic collapse in the future.
In a capitalist society, a failed borrower loses the ability to borrow in the future, just as a failed lender should also lose the ability to lend. The TBTFs should have been nationalized and wound down.
Banks create money out of thin air. They lend it into existence. They lose it? New fake money and creative accounting solves the problem (temporarily) while those outside of the banking system feel the real pain.
All I am trying to say is that there is a consensus that the political union is worth preserving. Personally I agree with this view. There's also a consensus that a disorderly default by a European sovereign will put such strain on the political union that there is a small, but meaningful probability that it will collapse. I also happen to agree with this view. Therefore, I speculate that the European powers that be have decided to implement a "disorderly default prevention" mechanism. Do I think it's a good mechanism? Well, I am not sure, but I can't think of better myself, so who am I to say it's a bad idea. What is your view?
BTW, the BIS data you cite is rather stale.
