Quote from Martinghoul:
Given that the ECB sterilizes its bond purchases, this is not, strictly speaking, a printing press.
Well, sure thing, it's entirely possible that the EU powers that be have decided that, in the interest of preserving the political union, losses on an eventual sov default have to be socialized. If that's the case, what they're doing is just making sure the default when/if it happens, occurs in an orderly fashion, without disrupting the mkts.Quote from Misthos:
The ECB's actions are making someone whole again, that under a capitalist system, should have experienced failure.
To me, that's printing, and it ultimately distorts the economy, and creates the circumstances for a greater catastrophe down the road.
Quote from deadbroke:
If newbies stumble in here .... (I'm eliminated auto because I'm new)
take note of these losers - a master list will be ready in a few months. If you decide to follow these individuals the answer is clear - the best you will ever hope to achieve is LOSE BIG.
Wallace, Petsamo, Trefoil, Tsing Tao, dumb mother, hoffmanw, Picaso, newguy05,
(note1: psytrade not included, still under observation)
(note 2: Wallace is a special case in that he is one of the most helpful people here and generally means well and is devoid of subterfuge and is never a pretender. But he don't know doodly, that's his problem)![]()
![]()
Quote from dumb_mother:
it won't collapse ever... until it does. it isn't an "if" anymore- it will simply happen either when the lies cannot be continued any longer, or china finds it in their best interest to call our bluffs
Quote from Wallace:
"The much anticipated economic demise hasn't happened.
Looks like the Continent's bust was a bust."
Michael Elliott, contributor, On Friday September 17, 2010, 5:30 am EDT
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/What-happened-to-Europes-hftn-1314322966.html?x=0
Quote from Martinghoul:
Well, sure thing, it's entirely possible that the EU powers that be have decided that, in the interest of preserving the political union, losses on an eventual sov default have to be socialized. If that's the case, what they're doing is just making sure the default when/if it happens, occurs in an orderly fashion, without disrupting the mkts.
My point is that, given sterilization, the EU program is not, strictly speaking, a turning on of the printing press.
Who gives a rat's ass about SocGen's and Deutsche's losses, Misthos? Come on, I would think that you of all people wouldn't succumb to the media frenzy.Quote from Misthos:
Whose losses are we discussing here? Deutsche Bank? Societe Generale? Yes, those two institutions are politically important, I would think. More so than the human constituents of the EU.
Quote from Martinghoul:
Who gives a rat's ass about SocGen's and Deutsche's losses, Misthos? Come on, I would think that you of all people wouldn't succumb to the media frenzy.
Do you know how much Greek debt is owned by SocGen and BNP combined (and that's including both banking and trading books)? Arnd â¬8bn, i.e. nothing. I still don't have the Deutsche numbers, but if you take Commerzbank and all of the Landesbanken, they own smth like â¬5.3bn, which is less than nothing. The big gaping black hole is sitting in Hypo Re, but, guess what, that's already fully owned by the German taxpayer (which are the human constituents of the EU). I could also wax poetic about the AIB situation, but that's a whole different kettle of fish.
The point is that surely by now you have seen that, unfortunately, banks are TBTF. That means that banking losses, once they're big enough, have to be socialized in the interest of stability (or at least that's the consensus among the powers that be). Every single govt has had to do this, so Europe is no exception.
Moreover, I fail to see the moral issue you're implicitly alluding to here. Gains from the bubble were enjoyed by all and sundry, so why should the losses not be?