What Exactly Are Mueller's Russians Supposed To Be Guilty Of?

[UsualName]

Usual Name has been bettered over and over in this thread. Has anyone ever determined if it's ricter?
I think we need to get to the bottom of that because ricter is an Canadian entity. And foreign entities need to register or something.

Is that so? Poindexter argues over whether 17 agencies wrote or endorsed a DNI report about Russian election interference. I never said the report was written or endorsed, only that 17 agencies said Russia meddled. Which isn’t even important, the contents of the report are what’s important.

Then our froggy friend confused himself when I explicitly stated Russian entities. But to be fair an entity can be a government as well as a company or organization.

You guys problem is you argue anything and you argue without purpose or importance. You’re not exercising your minds, your blowing off steam.

I’m easy to ignore, there’s a button for that. I enjoy watching the hysteria you guys live in and I am fascinated by how easily manipulated by fake news you guys are to. Everyday is interesting here.

 

[fhl]

The report was not endorsed by all of our intel agencies and that is long established. The report was written by a select few intel people picked by James Clapper. You claim it's not important after you used it to attempt to bolster an argument.

Then you attempted to move on by claiming it's the contents that are important. Those contents consisted of these few intel agents accepting Crowdstrike's report blaming the Russians for the dnc hacking, even though Crowdstrike was paid by the dnc and neither the intel agents or the FBI every examined the servers or any other physical evidence. To top it off, Donna Brazille admitted that the dnc destroyed the servers so they could not be examined by outsiders. Like the FBI.

The intel agents did do some perfunctory work, like oh, say, watching a few Russia Today programs and concluding that Russia didn't like Hillary.

Add it up and you have an appeal to authority. Take the few select intel agents word for this or you're a clown. That's all it amounted to.

I'm still interested in whether you are ricter.

 

[Tsing Tao]

I'm still interested in whether you are ricter.

I think the fact that he doesn't address it tells a tale.

 

[Frederick Foresight]

I think the fact that he doesn't address it tells a tale.

You mean like when Trump doesn't fully and properly acknowledge Russia's interference with the 2016 election? You mean like that? Gosh, what do you think he might he hiding? What tale does it tell?

 

[fhl]

As many as we can socialize on your credit card.

 

[Frederick Foresight]

"Who new?" "New?" I see English is not your first language, Boris. (Or are you Natasha today?)

 

[fhl]

"Who new?" "New?" I see English is not your first language, Boris. (Or are you Natasha today?)

Trying to pin the misspelling of a word in a meme I didn't create on me and use it as proof that I must be a Russian agent is very Muelleresqe, my unregistered Canadian entity friend.

 

[Tsing Tao]

You mean like when Trump doesn't fully and properly acknowledge Russia's interference with the 2016 election? You mean like that? Gosh, what do you think he might he hiding? What tale does it tell?

Yes, because comparing the President of the United States response to an FBI investigation to an Elitetrader sockpuppet that is likely another sockpuppet is the same. Or something. Yeah.

 

[gwb-trading]

"Who new?" "New?" I see English is not your first language, Boris. (Or are you Natasha today?)

Is it cold in Russia where you are posting from today?

 

[Poindexter]

Is that so? Poindexter argues over whether 17 agencies wrote or endorsed a DNI report about Russian election interference. I never said the report was written or endorsed, only that 17 agencies said Russia meddled.

Of course you didn't Mr. UsefulIdiot... there, there now.