if she is short the 180-170 puts ,say 200 of each,thats 2000 puts, she's long 2000 ,169 puts at a penny,so risk is defined and margin lowered,can't imagine any firm allowing the risk otherwise, first options corp ate a 50 million loss from a trader that had 2 million in his account in 87 with loads of seemingly worthless short puts
i agree but for the price of a cent the margin drops off substantially,can't believe she wouldn't take advantage of that in a couple of ways,hard to believe she could get a firm to let that flyi think she specifically said she is NAKED . so no spreads. reason is. that the tail end is so far off, that she doesnot need to cover the other leg, plus costs add up.
There is no magic in what she does; primarily sell puts on max leverage.
He has repeatedly stated that;
- she wasn't really trading in 2008;

Incorrect. She has been trading since 2002. Her return in 2007 was 50% on 100K of her own money. That's when people started to give her money so her AUM went up to ~800K. So she was managing about 800K in 2008, and she repeatedly said that they were looking for fleeing to Mexico, so she was definitely trading...
If Sosnoff really said that he is misleading his audience and he must be not remembering the interviews earlier...![]()
As you have clearly listened to all her interviews, and has a track record since 2002, what was her return in 2008?
The Mexico comment was referring to the flash crash in May 2010 which only fell about 9%!
Cheers
James
As you have clearly listened to all her interviews, and has a track record since 2002, what was her return in 2008?