nitro, this guy is an idiot; ignore is best place for him
i know i have more peace
And yet you keep reading my comments.
When you can't debate someone, ignore is the best place for them, right Jimmy?
Last edited:
nitro, this guy is an idiot; ignore is best place for him
i know i have more peace
Two steps, make assault rifles (AR) illegal to own, and I think there has to be a financial incentive for people to give ARs back voluntarily by giving them the market value of their AR back. Then, those ARs might be replaced by plain old hand guns - POHGs, and preferably not semi-automatic. But there are two components to a gun, and maybe number of rounds purchased is where people should be concentrating on not just type of weapon.
I see no reason other than that it might be cool to be able to own an assault rifle to have one. For hunting, a standard rifle is more than adequate. I am not suggesting people should not own gun since it is a constitutional right. I claim that we are all safer if we make assault rifles illegal to own for non military or police officers.
If you are a registered owner of an assault rifle and you have not turned in your rifle by a certain amount of time, you will be getting a house call from the army. If you want to get in a war with your assault rifle them, may you vaya con Dios.
Just a quick question to all you AR loving people. How many of you, while not in uniform, defended a single person that has been attacked by one of these warped people? Of the 300,000,000 guns owned in this country, how many in percent terms have been used for self-defense by non-military or non-police officers?
You are seven times more likely to get struck by lighting than to have to use an assault rifle to defend yourself.
Of those 300M only a tiny fraction are ARs. I didn't say it is against the law to own guns. On the contrary, it is a constitutional right. I say it is illegal to own an AR, and probably a semi-automatic handgun although I am willing to live with those.

I define an "AR" as a long gun with automatic capabilities. Not sure the caliber of the bullet matters. That is why I did not include standard rifles that you have to pull the lever back on to eject and reload as an AR. Hunters should be allowed to kill their own food.
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2012/12/semi-automatic-gun-assault-weapon-definitions
As I said, I can live with semi-automatic guns because it would probably be overwhelming to gather them all and go back to colt-45s.
"Every single rifle is semi-automatic"
Couldn't be farther from the truth.
E.G.:
http://www.marlinfirearms.com/firearms/centerfire/336c.asp
The Marlin 336 is a classic hunting rifle for big game. i.e. bear, deer, moose...etc.
I have a 336 30-30 in my closet. It only holds 6 shots and cannot be used to massacre large numbers of people. Several manufacturers make the same sort of gun. It is all the firepower you need to hunt big game. For each shot you have to crank the lever. No spraying allowed. Bears typically don't come in groups and try to kill you.
Assault style weapons are made for killing large numbers of people efficiently. There is no other rationale for such a weapon and it does not belong in civilian hands. I'm not sure it belongs in police hands. It's a military weapon.