What does gun violence really COST

lets be clear the stats are accurate...
snopes wrote a big bunch of nothing.

As a law professor once said.
When you got the facts you argue the facts
When you got the law you argue the law
When you got nothing you bang the table and make a lot of noise.
That was snopes banging the table with irrelevancies and red herrings.
They could not deny the fact that taking guns away was followed by more crime.

When this is the snopes headline...

MIXTURE OF TRUE AND FALSE INFORMATION

you know the left's meme is destroyed that issue.
 
Trader7793 said:
Nitro you have to realize that a law abiding citizen fighting off multiple criminals may need more than 3 rounds, or 4 rounds or 5 rounds. All of this gun control only succeeds in hampering the law abiding and not the criminal element.

http://freebeacon.com/issues/armed-detroit-woman-fights-off-5-home-invaders/

At any rate, restricting gun owners to 3 rounds would still be a violation of the second amendment.
More...
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
Good points; and any kind of long range shooting @ even paper or metal targets, which are the easiest to hit, requires much training-thus sniper school. A little bit of wind........ can goof up a lot, in long range shooting.

I agree with founding fathers [Judeo-Christian foundation on our nation]2nd amendment is important. Thanks
 
Mdngmvz.jpg
 
San Bernadino police just released the name of one suspect as Tayyeep Bin Ardogan, a 28 year-old Qatar citizen (Twitter)


Hey, I know. Lets let in about a hundred thousand of these middle east dudes and then let's take away all the guns from law abiding americans.

Obama and his minions could not possibly be this stupid. The logical conclusion must be what they want.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top