Totally spot on. The actual refugees are just the tip of the iceberg.
Let them stay in Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Kuwait, Egypt, ie closer countries with similar cultures. Plus, it's a lot cheaper so more can be taken in.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
What Does Extreme Vetting Look Like?
- Thread starter Good1
- Start date
Totally spot on. The actual refugees are just the tip of the iceberg.
Let them stay in Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Kuwait, Egypt, ie closer countries with similar cultures. Plus, it's a lot cheaper so more can be taken in.
really interesting reply.
An immigrant may be extreme vetted and pass every test, but it is generally the sons of muslim immigrants that become terrorists.
The parents may be happy to reach a safe country, but the male children are now growing up in an environment where merely being a man does not place them above women. They may get rejected by western women, and wish that they were brought up in the old country, where they could just buy a woman to serve them and bear children.
The old country where a man is always right if he quotes the Koran, and this makes him more intelligent than any Nobel prize winner, and certainly above any non muslim. Unsuccessful sons can rebel against everything western, and wish for their ideal vision of an Islamic paradise. Death to unbelievers.
Its a sad thing really, because I have seen religion do great things where people gather together in a positive spirit and help each other through the bad times.
The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_and_Nationality_Act_of_1952
Trump's recent XO referenced this act, although im not sure which version, as it has been tweaked a lot since '52, most notably in 1965 and again in 1990.
In '52 it was billed by two Democrats ( McCarran and Walter) and sent to Democrat President Truman who veto'd it, only to have his veto overridden by both houses of congress.
The phrasing that would have applied to Mohamedan demons was a prohibition against anyone with more than one wife.
Most interesting are the statements made about the bill by both President Falseman and the acts originators:
Sound familiar?
Before this Act, a variety of statutes governed immigration law but were not organized within one body of text.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_and_Nationality_Act_of_1952
Trump's recent XO referenced this act, although im not sure which version, as it has been tweaked a lot since '52, most notably in 1965 and again in 1990.
In '52 it was billed by two Democrats ( McCarran and Walter) and sent to Democrat President Truman who veto'd it, only to have his veto overridden by both houses of congress.
The phrasing that would have applied to Mohamedan demons was a prohibition against anyone with more than one wife.
Most interesting are the statements made about the bill by both President Falseman and the acts originators:
President Harry Truman, a Democrat, vetoed the Act because he regarded the bill as "un-American" and discriminatory. His veto message said:[1][2][3]
Today, we are "protecting" ourselves as we were in 1924, against being flooded by immigrants from Eastern Europe. This is fantastic. ... We do not need to be protected against immigrants from these countries–on the contrary we want to stretch out a helping hand, to save those who have managed to flee into Western Europe, to succor those who are brave enough to escape from barbarism, to welcome and restore them against the day when their countries will, as we hope, be free again....These are only a few examples of the absurdity, the cruelty of carrying over into this year of 1952 the isolationist limitations of our 1924 law.
In no other realm of our national life are we so hampered and stultified by the dead hand of the past, as we are in this field of immigration.
Sound familiar?
Speaking in the Senate on March 2, 1953, McCarran said:[4]
I believe that this nation is the last hope of Western civilization and if this oasis of the world shall be overrun, perverted, contaminated or destroyed, then the last flickering light of humanity will be extinguished. I take no issue with those who would praise the contributions which have been made to our society by people of many races, of varied creeds and colors. ... However, we have in the United States today hard-core, indigestible blocs which have not become integrated into the American way of life, but which, on the contrary are its deadly enemies. Today, as never before, untold millions are storming our gates for admission and those gates are cracking under the strain. The solution of the problems of Europe and Asia will not come through a transplanting of those problems en masse to the United States. ... I do not intend to become prophetic, but if the enemies of this legislation succeed in riddling it to pieces, or in amending it beyond recognition, they will have contributed more to promote this nation's downfall than any other group since we achieved our independence as a nation.
Before this Act, a variety of statutes governed immigration law but were not organized within one body of text.